Re: Resubmission of gsma imei urn for review
Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com> Fri, 12 October 2007 19:55 UTC
Return-path: <urn-nid-bounces@apps.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgQb9-00035o-Tb; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:55:03 -0400
Received: from urn-nid by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IgQb8-00032E-PK for urn-nid-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:55:02 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgQb8-0002xy-7r for urn-nid@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:55:02 -0400
Received: from zeke.toscano.org ([69.31.8.124] helo=zeke.ecotroph.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IgQb6-0002VV-Iz for urn-nid@apps.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:55:02 -0400
Received: from beethoven.local ([::ffff:209.183.196.229]) (AUTH: PLAIN leslie, SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by zeke.ecotroph.net with esmtp; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:54:50 -0400 id 01588373.470FD10A.00007293
Message-ID: <470FD1B7.4050100@thinkingcat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:57:43 -0400
From: Leslie Daigle <leslie@thinkingcat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Montemurro <montemurro.michael@gmail.com>
References: <26140d940702070808w223a2f8k84450d98e15dc548@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <26140d940702070808w223a2f8k84450d98e15dc548@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Cc: Andrew Allen <aallen@rim.com>, DMcDonald@gsm.org, Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Resubmission of gsma imei urn for review
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@apps.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.apps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@apps.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@apps.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: urn-nid-bounces@apps.ietf.org
Sorry, I didn't catch this in the last iteration on urn-nid mailing list. The "Community Considerations" section of the document is _empty_, and that needs to be fixed. Also, the "Namespace Considerations" section does not respond to the requirements laid out in RFC 3406. Your section describes why you selected a URN, without giving clarity about why a _new_ URN namespace is needed, IMO. (On the bright side -- I think some of the text you have for "Namespace Considerations" would be useful in the "Community Considerations" section :-) ). Leslie. [For easy reference -- the sections of text in the current document:] > 6. Community considerations > > > 7. Namespace considerations > > A URN was considered the most appropriate URI to represent the IMEI > and IMEISV as these identifiers may be used and transported similarly > to the Universally Unique Identifier (UUID)which is defined as a URN > in [10]. Since specifications for protocols that are used to > transport device identifiers often require the device identifier to > be globally unique and in the URN format it is necessary that the > IMEI and IMEISV URN formats are defined. Michael Montemurro wrote: > The draft for a gsma imei urn has been updated based on earlier > comments and is now posted for review at the following link: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn-01.txt > > Cheers, > > Mike > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- "Reality: Yours to discover." -- ThinkingCat Leslie Daigle leslie@thinkingcat.com -------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: Resubmission of gsma imei urn for review Leslie Daigle