IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] ZigBee Alliance "zcl" URN Formal Application

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Tue, 08 January 2019 02:26 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD34130E7E for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:26:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.933
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.933 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcastmailservice.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ec6ueqqWoi-8 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:26:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2024A130E71 for <urn@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 18:26:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.103]) by resqmta-ch2-06v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id gfiSgmLL2bX9Cgh61gG2vc; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 02:26:25 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1546914385; bh=/hzEyBTReMCXbQeSJPuBAL8hG4Sc3koid5566Wdwi8A=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=MrJWel4UgL/v1UyZqz2C7hp5C+hxdSHgg/aeUJIV4C+iDqlJ+7S6X351aDSX/rcfQ 28GinGbfhke3e/GnrGskUHBv/DQF70zfWe+Ni+vbSjeDLGBhwtmcQU9k12qqG6DIS5 3QgYc/CKiV1+3SKkV7660mURx29YOhYsL1FewWifEI0fZCPp0YJaoDDEk/gmS2wc9Y 5u0CsZMeNlzgXoFWdP/U7wadsNuYdS0y/kNlx61XxIkrPbwQIBkVEDPc9ae4usXfzu D1AgR5qKdUsDn2xuD19vJVs74X8SWk80mT95pM+PwrG68bMAoS1bW6X78PCu7iXLPL 8UfPdwoH7FsbA==
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([IPv6:2601:192:4603:9471:222:fbff:fe91:d396]) by resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id gh5wgCQ14QFZMgh5xgQlXQ; Tue, 08 Jan 2019 02:26:24 +0000
X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0;st=legit
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x082QKLV012508; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 21:26:20 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id x082QJkU012505; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 21:26:19 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com
To: "Harvey, Roy" <Roy.Harvey@osram.com>
Cc: urn@ietf.org, urn-nid@apps.ietf.org, vberrios@zigbee.org
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0701MB286658F2DF5258AC6C511B068C890@AM5PR0701MB2866.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> (Roy.Harvey@osram.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 21:26:19 -0500
Message-ID: <87r2dn996c.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/0GNPsjaEPcykKJYk1wWBPtZ6Xjs>
Subject: Re: [urn] ZigBee Alliance "zcl" URN Formal Application
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 02:26:28 -0000

"Harvey, Roy" <Roy.Harvey@osram.com> writes:
> In 2016, the Zigbee Alliance requested a URN Namespace ID, "zcl", via
> the process and template in RFC 8141.  Dale Worley provided feedback,
> which was incorporated into a revised application sent in August 2016
> to urn-nid@apps.ietf.org<mailto:urn-nid@apps.ietf.org> .  Zigbee has
> not received notification of acceptance or issues with the
> application.

Administrative details:

The messages on urn-nid are:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/current/msg01428.html
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/current/msg01429.html
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/current/msg01430.html
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/current/msg01431.html

The version of the URN definition attached to the message I'm replying
to (Roy.Harvey@osram.com, 7 Jan 2019) is the same as the "revised
definition" in the 3rd of the above messages (msg01430).

My opinion;

As I stated in the 4th of the above messages (msg01431), "Clearly, that
takes care of all my concerns."  I believe we should approve this
application.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email