IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [urn] Summary of WG decisions Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-semantics-clarif-03

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 31 May 2016 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9685312D18D for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G14B3brOuRX4 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667B012D1CD for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 06:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([93.217.80.42]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M936L-1bD0IM1LWX-00CSn4; Tue, 31 May 2016 15:39:35 +0200
To: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
References: <231532ef-e195-b73d-4a34-eb445bdd1900@gmx.de> <c19ff352-cd49-d664-9365-28898cff3050@gmx.de> <1F5D414703BF94503600A5E3@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAAQiQRf0DYh-BuwRaEY6xLpQyNrxw55dFH=s+FRjVATkCM8HDQ@mail.gmail.com> <9dd1f7f1-843e-822b-a352-8b51d6f4192c@gmx.de> <0626757a-430e-4c25-07e0-efd04e92c377@seantek.com> <CAAQiQRdoOSKx26g3D-KEf-Mf8rQHf6Rm6jzR56wQHraLXrXMdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <dabb41d1-b4d0-8d44-eeb9-1c734ef06cd1@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 15:39:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQRdoOSKx26g3D-KEf-Mf8rQHf6Rm6jzR56wQHraLXrXMdg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5y4LHuUEjhxp6nxtCjAbPT7VpaXcb30WfuxSLsTf13pjqBaKtp3 Ph97ZkBI+iIVTKJXe6UAuRSvo4aXRQw5Xqkk1LzYYeX6UMWelbtF6IwTOYn/FFxD+U0DIi4 ppMxAG4sClS3mQAe98XUORZv/JYMtwinUQ/VxQGPiyUs0BFzVaKR9nN8gK77iOJiA1XtYdK Sz6H1z3t33F3nH1lPJLUA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:DzfTEg15gOg=:bEG7s5YHQ/Tg/8xP9Agbb8 R/a0Q1Xsh/B24VHuOzK2P0LjMTpbAvVPa49hSOTFclUR8cz9cH2fKFNJSfdVAOLwV1Mqsc6g9 U6IOcBfHxlSkAdf0kgiVaMoM4PEYEGM7VYWiEb0RT/3aXKtfOpjr7/sY9noMiOE4ukkYRwrr0 TkOs7if7yiaLlA/jYxBNFBFSGVv16R0K/1dCp85mBz0ilOmXGcoLWT+Kyyln+4rQ2hmGJRhrH bv5Ewe9N39iu9rXuWles426xbACrJIm+hKmpvxjfz98jEFNqk8OC/O8LKEMZB8mIyMNTI+LLV FLdW2w7higQPFlJmE8wqN3OXZO66Rrdxt/9My+S66TVrusgUFPGX9IIkqic1pWjo/J/bHtOBn Ew8FOpodGjKCGQAZywnVLq0pvAm/Z3w4WihOSyqpFSq9DEb/+AqFsNqwQ7+IN9VreF3d53pz+ ZhuTSuC+n94C85h+rdOO/4bG60NSVNTmfYxg4lU3Moboke/Su06P92vm/61GkQtY4Y21GtF62 PZuJyjFo+x7C3pYEjnMQK1WXIQl+YVjtbW0TyWe1gvqAwfoYpA+V4l0lvjHf9GycU5M/oKe58 vN5mBS0ptnwdbXseVfKraZBMpn17j41foDdaMv/QXpAMkOl1QG1ufYd3kbsk+pR+wqA11KeEs KV3lLuHIPZ/GE+eukarQq8kJXw5/Rn/NtlCCTDyvYCsmerLYkhjxB+SO3M6DRO9kHZSp92D9E xugwL1oMrpTwIxSoXhx1KrrnAvt0RYfqDwO/g7c0xwHLxovyf6b/w8eHq3dKBmOwURiD2qAhe jRBEESK
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/99moU5ZYdzMS2YTajfjoJ6mtJQs>
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] Summary of WG decisions Re: Feedback on draft-ietf-urnbis-semantics-clarif-03
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:39:59 -0000

On 2016-05-31 15:31, Andrew Newton wrote:
> Let me address a couple of points with one message:
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> wrote:
>> On 5/17/2016 9:10 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> So, once again, if we say "updates: 3986" we need to be able to explain
>>> *precisely* which parts of RFC 3986 are affected (and why, fwiw).
>
> Just for my sanity, I reread
> draft-ietf-urnbis-semantics-clarif-03.txt. It seems to me that this
> draft does exactly the thing you have requested.
> ...

It might *intend* to do it, but (a) it's very unclear what the actual 
change is, (b) whether it is needed, and (c) whether that it tries to 
change actually is consistent with what the URN spec attempts to do.

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email