Re: [urn] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-2141bis-00.txt

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 15 October 2012 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC6B21F853C for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.069
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.069 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.520, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_TOWRITE=1.05, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bDz2J7pNw5zc for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71BE21F853B for <urn@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9F2775k019204; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 19:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1350266831; bh=moIrWHynHEQ4BgtH1+AXPEFEybx06eS7l7f+J4gd39Y=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=lw1w7woW4N16jKH/D4zij1Esminb6HFx7LSboFHEheA2rHk7byi58QxHHWlZZevAz sRY5Pz3q+I67CsdmLEZbMJfXoEsFNfcCgjPQZDkHwjak2hzRxmd0XSqcrCeL6esaLE yIf8txCNUlTHsj8zS4T6SzTpKgpkV9sF7ntacvSk=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1350266831; i=@resistor.net; bh=moIrWHynHEQ4BgtH1+AXPEFEybx06eS7l7f+J4gd39Y=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=sXZbXMDjLzP25shGGw9de4w8GjM+UIcqkhxcBeuyGUTqL5mCr7G2QQPx2YwKkdmYe DOuj+auEeZn4A7wdAJBzgxl6qCVwtE8Qpvd9pLzT7EcGGE0YKfjdtRC/7J1M7kweWN FmevIxJdfhHOIC30ZzekF1oOZEV4+tXSP9eaIk18=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20121014173251.0c043f78@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 17:42:12 -0700
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <507A1983.6070308@stpeter.im>
References: <20121014013640.21248.98685.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <507A1983.6070308@stpeter.im>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: urn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [urn] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-saintandre-2141bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 02:07:13 -0000

Hi Peter,
At 18:46 13-10-2012, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>that specification. Therefore I have decided to write an alternative
>specification of 2141bis that I hope can serve as a starting point for
>renewed discussion within the WG. Your feedback is welcome.

I like the lean approach of this alternative.  Thanks to Alfred for 
following up on the comments I sent a few months ago.  I prefer to be 
quiet about the level of idleness as I am usually incorrect about that. :-)

Regards,
-sm