Re: [urn] Some more thoughts on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3188bis-nbn-urn-02
Juha Hakala <juha.hakala@helsinki.fi> Wed, 01 February 2012 14:53 UTC
Return-Path: <juha.hakala@helsinki.fi>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1069221F8771 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:53:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.677, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RNuZXvilNH7t for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi (smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi [128.214.173.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D08C21F876F for <urn@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:53:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.214.91.90] (kkkl25.lib.helsinki.fi [128.214.91.90]) by smtp-rs1.it.helsinki.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q11Ereco027657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:53:40 +0200
Message-ID: <4F2951F4.6060705@helsinki.fi>
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:53:40 +0200
From: Juha Hakala <juha.hakala@helsinki.fi>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bengt Neiss <bengt.neiss@kb.se>
References: <F52230A186DA59469E8E21CF80FE6D4D0F23F851@SRVVM305.kb.local>
In-Reply-To: <F52230A186DA59469E8E21CF80FE6D4D0F23F851@SRVVM305.kb.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "urn@ietf.org" <urn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [urn] Some more thoughts on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc3188bis-nbn-urn-02
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about possible revisions to the definition of Uniform Resource Names <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:53:47 -0000
Hello Bengt, I will take the comments 1-5 into account when preparing the next version of rfc3188bis. An immediate response to comment 6 is below. Bengt Neiss wrote: > > > Hello all.. > > > > Some more thoughts on the text.. > 6. One more thing - should text-proposals be sent to the list or > directly to the editor(s)? It is better to send them to the list, because that fosters discussion and makes the life of the editor easier - a comment does not need to be replicated, when people see that it has been made already. All the best, Juha > > Regards, > > > > //Bengt > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Bengt Neiss > > Kungl. Biblioteket / National Library of Sweden > > Phone: +46 (0)10 709 35 41 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > urn mailing list > urn@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn -- Juha Hakala Senior advisor, standardisation and IT The National Library of Finland P.O.Box 15 (Unioninkatu 36, room 503), FIN-00014 Helsinki University Email juha.hakala@helsinki.fi, tel +358 50 382 7678
- [urn] Some more thoughts on draft-ietf-urnbis-rfc… Bengt Neiss
- Re: [urn] Some more thoughts on draft-ietf-urnbis… Juha Hakala