[urn] Finalizing items from IETF 83

Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us> Tue, 26 June 2012 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9854121F8483 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJcvJVyzoTbI for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC91F21F847F for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yenq13 with SMTP id q13so79365yen.31 for <urn@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state; bh=8n5onxwaxE+wWkdZlBaBjsGl9yFCJSX1oEFC4jbrwuk=; b=Kknb9c5EAtaP4DrZsdoVb9FJWqO9yQ819RBVekuSzMiuB2TLgnuQ5iH/cNfJitZ98f z83BOdaf6iubL4A9oS0PKlegGcGWZsCdGAq00EVdGZH6CojxOA5LfxoQOTyyKyqIvp4i EGE5fa67Ubn04Ja04yS7R26meKotTsvKRRnq5tMlC0y2tZOe4jSyvBqUXqBKxjGll2t5 QWDkRHpaRtpH08SilmKs9GdALsG6q1ISmOHkjjrepPNgX87U/LtsP2ZKDxGcF6Gp2Zyp HEZWlqrK8ukUjk/eRfs1q3wk56Tc6iFil1yCVLDQb7eXBMli8naHY5PDjDizgiWofA9w 4/kA==
Received: by with SMTP id o17mr5664286ann.87.1340727031113; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:500:4:15:754f:a154:1fd0:4c5d? ([2001:500:4:15:754f:a154:1fd0:4c5d]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c28sm104674788yhk.2.2012. (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:10:28 -0400
Message-Id: <234FA8E3-C00D-4DA9-AD6C-41A3AC2548E4@hxr.us>
To: urn@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmuol57WsWi4LtM3lAzUeiOV9Dp25uD5/4gPwfWGTT9NsNXirUo0dIgIcVfhgL48j61xX8z
Subject: [urn] Finalizing items from IETF 83
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:10:32 -0000


There are two items that surfaced during the URNBIS working group meeting in Paris (IETF 83) which I should have explicitly noted on this mailing list but neglected to do so. That is my fault.

The first item was brought forward in the presentations on 2141bis and 3406bis. The editors of these drafts have noted, in these documents, issues they feel are closed. At IETF 83 I asked for a review of these issues by working group participants and for any notes of dissent or inquiries to be sent to this mailing list by April 16. Given this request was never explicitly stated here, I would like to re-invite working group participants to review the 2141bis and 3406bis issues. If possible, I would ask that concerns raised from these reviews be given on this mailing list before July 13.

Second, at IETF 83 Leslie Daigle proposed removing the fragment language from 2141bis and placing it in a separate draft to be moved forward as an Experimental RFC. If you have objections to this approach, please let us know (again, before July 13).

(obviously over-paid co-chair).