[urn] The "semantics clarification", aka "syntax only" draft

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Sat, 14 February 2015 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564C01A1A86 for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:34:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Ur6ipTOk5Rx for <urn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECC91A1A73 for <urn@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.35] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1YMWJE-000A2y-4d for urn@ietf.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 01:34:32 -0500
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 01:34:27 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: urn@ietf.org
Message-ID: <E8B90C4A28D5329F74250588@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.35
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn/VZqUUiSvCxkzxVj86Mj8TGmByus>
Subject: [urn] The "semantics clarification", aka "syntax only" draft
X-BeenThere: urn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Revisions to URN RFCs <urn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn>, <mailto:urn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 06:34:35 -0000

Hi.

As the list has been told by announcements from the tracker,
I've just posted draft-ietf-urnbis-semantics-clarif-01.   The
Change Log is fairly comprehensive but, for those looking for a
quick preview:

* I don't believe that it is substantively different from the
previous version or the intent of the WG on which Andy has ruled
there is consensus.

* I've eliminated material that -00 and list discussions
indicated was going to go away.

* This version is aligned with 2141bis-08 and -09 while the
prior version predated them..

* I've done considerable editorial work to make the document
read more smoothly and make it more ready for publication
(should we decide to do that) as well as to incorporate various
clarifications the need for which was identified on the mailing
list.

Those reading carefully will notice two things in the References:

(1) The reference to 2141bis should have had its date and
authors corrected and should be normative now.  Fixed in the
working version that will evolve into of -02 of this "semantics
clarification" I-D -- I'm not going to repost just to correct
that unless the co-chairs tell me to.

(2) There is essentially a forward pointer to
draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition, listing a February 2015
date.  A revised version of that document should be posted
within the next few days.  As a preview, the most important
change in it is eliminating the reference to 3406bis since that
document was collapsed into 2141bis.

    john