Re: [urn] The "semantics clarification", aka "syntax only" draft

[Melinda Shore <[e-mail]>]

On 2/13/15 9:34 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> (1) The reference to 2141bis should have had its date and
> authors corrected and should be normative now.  Fixed in the
> working version that will evolve into of -02 of this "semantics
> clarification" I-D -- I'm not going to repost just to correct
> that unless the co-chairs tell me to.

I'm not sure where Andy stands on this sort of thing but since
getting through last call and into IESG review often involves
multiple iterations around what are essentially nits, I tend
to feel it's fine to wait until then to resolve known nits.

> (2) There is essentially a forward pointer to
> draft-ietf-urnbis-ns-reg-transition, listing a February 2015
> date.  A revised version of that document should be posted
> within the next few days.  As a preview, the most important
> change in it is eliminating the reference to 3406bis since that
> document was collapsed into 2141bis.

Excellent - thanks so much for all your work on getting revisions
out.

Melinda