Re: [urn] LEI namespace registration request

[Ivan Marin <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Peter for your comments.

I have added suggested modifications:
- amended the title to: "Namespace Identifier:  LEI"
- urn:LEI:foo is equivalent to urn:lei:foo ... as the "LEI" name is not case sensitive.
- As is correct, I keep the template titles for easier reference in further reviews. 

Find version 7 attached.

Following your statement: "Everything else looks fine to me and I can work with IANA to add this NID to the registry."
We understand that you push it through the IANA registration process.

Which dates can we expect for its final release or publication?
Let us know please if further actions are needed on our side at this stage to make it happen.

Thanks for your support.


Regards,
Ivan Marin 
GLEIF Business Development
 
 

On 17/12/21, 21:47, "Peter Saint-Andre" <[e-mail]> wrote:

    Hi Ivan,
    
    Thanks for your work on this and your patience with the review team.
    
    Here are a few small suggestions regarding your request.
    
    "Namespace Identifier:  Requested of IANA (formal)"
    
    Presumably this should be:
    
    "Namespace Identifier:  LEI"
    
    We can probably shorten the "Purpose" section but it's fine as is 
    (although let's remove the questions/guidance copied over from the 
    template itself).
    
    With regard to the syntax and equivalence, urn:LEI:foo should be 
    equivalent to urn:lei:foo and in general we have not specified that the 
    Namespace Identifier is uppercase (e.g., "LEI") with past registrations:
    
    https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml
    
    Everything else looks fine to me and I can work with IANA to add this 
    NID to the registry.
    
    Peter
    
    On 9/21/21 2:21 AM, Ivan Marin wrote:
    > Hi,
    > 
    > we have generated a new version attached adding some more information of 
    > the existing LEI system (which we are asking the namespace registration 
    > for) that is mature and providing already service world wide.
    > 
    > Let us know please if you need further information and what else is 
    > needed from our side to get the namespace released.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > 
    > *Ivan Marin*
    > GLEIF Business Development
    > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
    > Global Legal Entity IdentifierFoundation (GLEIF)
    > Bleichstrasse 59, 60313, Frankfurtam Main, Germany
    > Work Phone: [phone]
    > Cell phone: [phone]
    > Email: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
    > Web: www.gleif.org <http://www.gleif.org>
    > 
    > 
    > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . .
    > Global Legal Entity IdentifierFoundation (GLEIF)
    > St. Alban-Vorstadt 5, PO Box,4002 Basel, Switzerland
    > Chairman of the Board: StevenJoachim
    > CEO: Stephan Wolf
    > Commercial-Register-No.: CHE-200.595.965
    > LEI: 506700GE1G29325QX363
    > 
    > This message may containconfidential and/or privilegedinformation. If 
    > you are not theintended recipient or if you havereceived this message in 
    > error,please notify the sender anddelete this message. Anyunauthorised 
    > copying, disclosureor distribution of this message is strictly forbidden.
    > 
    >> On 13 Sep 2021, at 10:01, Ivan Marin <[e-mail] 
    >> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
    >>
    >> Thanks for your feedback Mr. Worley.
    >>
    >> Besides the document shared, you can also find all the information 
    >> regarding LEI here: 
    >> https://www.gleif.org/en/about-lei/introducing-the-legal-entity-identifier-lei 
    >> <https://www.gleif.org/en/about-lei/introducing-the-legal-entity-identifier-lei>
    >>
    >> Indeed as you have stated the LEI system is already well-developed and 
    >> standardized and all the LEI namespace registration provides is a 
    >> systematic way of mapping existing LEIs into URNs.
    >>
    >> We are willing to read your revised version. Let us know any question 
    >> you may have.
    >>
    >> Regards,
    >> Ivan Marin
    >> GLEIF Business Development
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 11/9/21, 04:10, "Dale R. Worley" <[e-mail] 
    >> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
    >>
    >>    Please consider revising your descriptions to emphasize certain points
    >>    which I only fully grasped as I had nearly finished reading the
    >>    document.
    >>
    >>    When I started reading the document, I was unaware of the system of 
    >> LEIs
    >>    that already exists, and so without thinking I assumed that all of what
    >>    you describe is a proposed system.  Instead, the LEI system is already
    >>    well-developed and standardized and all the LEI namespace registration
    >>    provides is a systematic way of mapping existing LEIs into URNs.
    >>
    >>    I suspect that this misunderstanding is due to minor matters of 
    >> wording,
    >>    combined with the fact that I was reading the registration quite
    >>    quickly.  But as you prepare a revised version please consider my
    >>    mistake.
    >>
    >>    Dale
    >>
    >>
    > 
    > 
    > _______________________________________________
    > urn mailing list
    > [e-mail]
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn