Re: [urn] Request for urn mrn

[Kasper Nielsen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Peter,

Sorry for the long delay was away on vacation.
Am I right in understanding that as a general an application like mine
would no longer have a RFC as an outcome?
But "only" a registration of the namespace with IANA.

Best
  Kasper

On 9 July 2017 at 01:17, Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Kaspar,
>
> The two most recent registrations (ISBN and ISSN) follow the new
> template, and they are excellent examples:
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/isbn
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-formal/issn
>
> By the way, you no longer need to submit an Internet-Draft, although
> that is helpful for purposes of review.
>
> Peter
>
> On 7/8/17 2:21 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > Thank you so much for bringing this to my intention. I've modelled the
> > draft after previous URN RFC submissions based on RFC 2141 + 3406, are
> > there any RFCs following RFC 8141 that I can use as a basis for
> > restructuring my submission? I have been unable to find any at
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xhtml
> >
> > I am especially struggling with the overall layout. I currently have
> > these chapters
> >
> > Introduction
> > Specification Template
> >   Namespace ID
> >   Registration Information
> >   ...
> > Examples
> > Namespace Considerations
> > Community Considerations
> > Security Considerations
> > IANA Considerations
> >
> > But in RFC 8141 all of these are put into a specification template.
> > What overall structure should I use? Should I just put everything into a
> > specification chapter?
> >
> > Best
> >   Kasper
> >
> >
> > On 1 July 2017 at 23:51, Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]
> > <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Kaspar,
> >
> >     Thank you for working on this proposed namespace ID and for the
> careful
> >     documentation in Internet-Draft form.
> >
> >     RFC 2141 and RFC 3406 have been replaced by RFC 8141, and the
> >     registration template has changed (based on many years of experience
> >     with registration of new namespaces). As a result, the Internet-Draft
> >     you have posted is not quite conformant to the new template and
> process.
> >     Please refer to RFC 8141 for details:
> >
> >     https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8141
> >     <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8141>
> >
> >     Please let us know when you have posted version -03 of the
> specification
> >     so that we can review it again.
> >
> >     Best Regards,
> >
> >     Peter
> >
> >     On 7/1/17 4:03 AM, Kasper Nielsen wrote:
> >     > Greetings,
> >     >
> >     > On behalf of the International Association of Marine Aids to
> >     Navigation
> >     > and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA AISM) I would like to submit a
> >     > registration request for the urn “mrn”.
> >     >
> >     > The International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and
> >     > Lighthouse Authorities (IALA) is a non-profit, international
> technical
> >     > association servicing more than 80 countries in the field of
> >     marine aids
> >     > to navigation.
> >     >
> >     > The detail about the request can be seen at
> >     > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02
> >     <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-knielsen-mrn-urn-02>
> >     >
> >     > Please contact me and let me know in case you need further
> information
> >     > to process the request.
> >     >
> >     > Best Regards
> >     >
> >     > Kasper Nielsen
> >     >
> >     > IT Architect
> >     > Danish Maritime Authority
> >     > Carl Jacobsens Vej 31
> >     > 2500 Valby
> >     > Denmark
> >     > [phone] <tel:%2B45%2026737340>
> >     >
> >
> >
>
>