IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Require TLS=NO is very much needed

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Fri, 17 November 2017 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D76127977 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:24:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MYmBjoVfnuGm for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [108.5.242.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D758B1275C5 for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:24:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2714F7A3309 for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ietf-dane@dukhovni.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <c5a5a679-0fbe-bc1f-0122-b8c374e5cee8@sunet.se>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 06:24:16 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: uta@ietf.org
Message-Id: <326E7AA1-6DCA-4376-ACCD-7749CD9ACD30@dukhovni.org>
References: <32C4B825-C3D6-4C25-9C1D-BCF4354CA326@dukhovni.org> <ed552e3e-00ce-5329-f38b-f763feacc17c@sunet.se> <5A0E7D70.6060302@isode.com> <eb82779b-bed0-ba40-e642-6d7ec2aec387@sunet.se> <0620480C-32FB-43B3-8C5A-C4752C1C62E3@dukhovni.org> <AEA98959-039D-49D4-B1E6-76882A34CB17@akamai.com> <c5a5a679-0fbe-bc1f-0122-b8c374e5cee8@sunet.se>
To: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/2S8nMbUKEVT-Pe-KUYW1Wf81eM8>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Require TLS=NO is very much needed
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:24:19 -0000

> On Nov 17, 2017, at 5:01 AM, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> wrote:
> 
> Yeah I also disagree (as an individual). The person who made the
> comment is the same person who first suggested the feature be added.

FWIW, my recollection is that I was the who suggested the need for the
"NO" case when Jim first presented the idea REQUIRETLS (in Berlin IIRC).
But of course who suggested it first should not grant any special
privilege to have work in that direction stop or continue.

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status