IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Require TLS=NO is very much needed

Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se> Fri, 17 November 2017 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64311293E0 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 02:06:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sunet-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37Ro5aJUv_0M for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 02:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55E35120724 for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 02:06:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id x7so1626770pfa.1 for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 02:06:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sunet-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RiAwjsb1s3gUPzarQrsltAIZTjbYZ3b1GvtbwebU++U=; b=RHRf6jyZrnRen2iO0JmsgqLOzDdX0UBNVJWjAd5PnAkAc2iavUZAH7f2hivGV7+RFa zzWHA1+UKuneTM/57hUbBgCxQetaF8bqais0MsJC3Vs2Uiefp2HYTH8Yw8AA4flGIBrL 0QXS5No+MAzwrK05s6HzB9RTaBMNMYkjd4W55IvW5aOJJCJlW/4MXgm/KJDZS06Del/G 5SyEVGEzt3zO001DVI/HAEJgbTlZb0W7P06XY88khnlHJM4t30un9In5KWSPxQSOWvHp PbR4ikcgNE1nDKAASsSDcCaRauAhThSzLI7pdNKqrfKWyAIZcBpX4cL+/oYSt25otyqa tnuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RiAwjsb1s3gUPzarQrsltAIZTjbYZ3b1GvtbwebU++U=; b=Q1WnlslyS4TiJTRRQwsqJXt4ZuwB8FHFSoQOH67qdnSOfmraGw31jVCUXgupE0psv4 h9sryHtZiqXCMsmScZXZ/MvYzYKZgiFnDTQH1JriOOQPfEcBSAStYJEhLTc52rtskn3P VeqSZuxLam7gnys1wvQhsnnYxOXnCyE4991pFwsDwh+gAOmHR5SHv/9Of8Pl76plkoXg QMy7lpJdJ0ZMqsQ1drIuLSCsjtRh9GFFSKrhrVvAnqZ2AVohsRnIzxO5i2iiTjV2S9E+ m+zU05Jtlw53Ytwp+eWaM+GQuzPA1BPovZINhS2RREE+8a7BRfkRw2nRPicCI6GUsKJX R27g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4qRbSGo8yyt97hrOd+liZsHSkKDNqFbCxGyx+GUG2fbPQ7BX16 njezCzvZ2hF5YqDrMII8kF3nws8WONU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYqn2S7uqe7Pmk+MO5oLmzIdxnBOUHdj7skO2vjCrTsJazfvGuVQ+JIbWx1AovEwMz8evhONg==
X-Received: by 10.84.138.1 with SMTP id 1mr4677029plo.156.1510913165664; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 02:06:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.166.76] ([101.100.166.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m6sm6957746pfm.121.2017.11.17.02.06.04 for <uta@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Nov 2017 02:06:04 -0800 (PST)
To: uta@ietf.org
References: <32C4B825-C3D6-4C25-9C1D-BCF4354CA326@dukhovni.org> <ed552e3e-00ce-5329-f38b-f763feacc17c@sunet.se> <5A0E7D70.6060302@isode.com> <eb82779b-bed0-ba40-e642-6d7ec2aec387@sunet.se> <0620480C-32FB-43B3-8C5A-C4752C1C62E3@dukhovni.org> <AEA98959-039D-49D4-B1E6-76882A34CB17@akamai.com> <3C48EC8E-FA2E-4E16-9C02-63ED5E4C46A1@dukhovni.org>
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Message-ID: <53c5d4e8-bbfa-fb1f-639b-23ceaedfd74b@sunet.se>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 11:06:02 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3C48EC8E-FA2E-4E16-9C02-63ED5E4C46A1@dukhovni.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/ybMPlYCID3N1-SVKGS7rvjMAP6g>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Require TLS=NO is very much needed
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:06:08 -0000

On 2017-11-17 10:15, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Nov 17, 2017, at 3:49 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
>>
>> I was there and I disagree with your characterization.
> 
> I watched the entire session after the fact, I stand by my
> assessment that the conclusions were premature.  I've been
> focused on this space for ~15 years now, so I am probably
> not making stuff up..

I feel a certain level of frustration from you Victor but
let me assure you you have no reason to feel that way - as
usual in the IETF the only decisions that matter are the
ones made on the list.

Let me suggest that we focus less on who said what and
why and instead focus on the issue at hand: should we
split the draft or not!

As chair I want to encourage everyone to present their
views regardless of how many years they may have under
their belt.

	Cheers Leif

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status