IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Wed, 16 December 2015 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5251A000A; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:56:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U-veBFXot4iv; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94F541A0087; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id a188so27772210vkc.0; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:56:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tFmzAkaN6CqNVjsssR0BQJj85zMt4MH4GbAPZ4xx0Zs=; b=gMVTuvGpHqUYiymnpFAQ0w3rHWghMATZZhXv1wFU0zRpyoE9W9OFtRXVc32MBpYTtU /TuFDHR7MaBSkTRFHrnbdcEitNTmd9EwGxtEyVjq6OOAXQC/2sDFOekYHlEI4gL1JcRB bQlSy+/NhSIaiu0SaaSF1jqH8w5UPb8WvpPzVDAaIevA4dr5ro+HEo7v+wQ6A9+eyrjN d33Nc9qTMve+6qwHDPfRsZT95FjBYqRfmUzquza8oW55jqTwdjk4umZVxFzTPlCUv1/l Go2YFGpTriKYPPUw7z7GPOxbgAEl8rWv6v2cHLUnkoz1OZKyDb/bEIwUUgmr9ROcvm2H kQog==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.31.47.70 with SMTP id v67mr14831548vkv.130.1450277814686; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.31.182.211 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:56:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <56715A12.6030201@isode.com>
References: <20151215212018.19644.59560.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <56715A12.6030201@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:56:54 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: scg_hJprJ3A1UUhc9QH0QP8D5kA
Message-ID: <CALaySJK79DS3r61GKNk9A7mrAH-_dLWw02vLFtPQ2m4VmniTcw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/ADfEgUuBGhJ8hfk0ngv3D_Oyjzk>
Cc: "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>, uta-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-uta-email-tls-certs-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:56:57 -0000

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Alexey Melnikov
<alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> Hi Barry,
> I am going to quickly answer to your DISCUSS point and will reply to your
> comments separately:
>
> On 15/12/2015 21:20, Barry Leiba wrote:
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> DISCUSS:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> A small question before I go to "Yes":
>>
>> RFC 2595 Section 2.4 says:
>>
>>     - Matching is case-insensitive.
>>
>> This document does not.  Was that dropped intentionally?
>
> This was replaced by section 6.4 (Matching the DNS Domain Name Portion) from
> RFC 6125 and its subsections. So by pointing to RFC 6125 there is no need to
> say that.
>
> Best Regards,
> Alexey
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email