IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uta] Proposed list of deliverables

"Orit Levin (LCA)" <oritl@microsoft.com> Sat, 18 January 2014 06:25 UTC

Return-Path: <oritl@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723C51ADEA1 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:25:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sB97oOt1zFHX for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:24:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0241.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664421ADE72 for <uta@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:24:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.139.24) by BY2PR03MB297.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.139.14) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.851.11; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:24:45 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.139.24]) by BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.139.24]) with mapi id 15.00.0851.011; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:24:45 +0000
From: "Orit Levin (LCA)" <oritl@microsoft.com>
To: "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Proposed list of deliverables
Thread-Index: Ac8UDfYmUjL7spWFRWi+szgpg2cFIg==
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:24:44 +0000
Message-ID: <0bc674da169f4772b0fb2173ed679115@BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [98.247.123.117]
x-forefront-prvs: 0095BCF226
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(679001)(779001)(689001)(199002)(189002)(164054003)(31966008)(93136001)(92566001)(74502001)(93516002)(74662001)(47446002)(76176001)(56776001)(79102001)(81542001)(77982001)(59766001)(81342001)(76786001)(76796001)(76576001)(66066001)(65816001)(80022001)(54316002)(74316001)(74876001)(74706001)(63696002)(69226001)(74366001)(49866001)(47736001)(85852003)(51856001)(81686001)(53806001)(47976001)(83072002)(50986001)(4396001)(33646001)(46102001)(87266001)(87936001)(80976001)(2656002)(56816005)(81816001)(90146001)(19580395003)(83322001)(54356001)(76482001)(85306002)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB297; H:BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:98.247.123.117; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: [Uta] Proposed list of deliverables
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:25:01 -0000

Below is the list of deliverables for your consideration:

1. A threat analysis document containing a collection of known security breaches to application protocols due to poor use of TLS (Likely an Informational RFC) 
2. Applications' independent document recommending best existing and future practices for using TLS (Likely a BCP or a Proposed Standard RFC) 
3. A set of documents, each describing best existing and future practices for using TLS with a specific application protocol, i.e., SMTP, POP, IMAP, XMPP, HTTP 1.1, etc. (Case-by-case likely a BCP or a Proposed Standard RFC) 
4. A document discussing (and potentially defining) how to apply the opportunistic encryption approach (preliminary outlined in draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-00.txt) to TLS. (Category TBD)

Please, send your feedback to the list (including short +1s to indicate that the direction makes sense to you).

Thanks,
Leif and Orit - the chairs.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email