IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uta] Proposed list of deliverables

"Orit Levin (LCA)" <oritl@microsoft.com> Mon, 03 February 2014 18:57 UTC

Return-Path: <oritl@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E371A01E3 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:57:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76-7GxejrIyr for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:57:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1blp0181.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0CC1A0162 for <uta@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 10:57:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BL2PR03MB290.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.68.19) by BL2PR03MB291.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.141.68.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.873.10; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 18:57:36 +0000
Received: from BL2PR03MB290.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.68.19]) by BL2PR03MB290.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.141.68.19]) with mapi id 15.00.0873.009; Mon, 3 Feb 2014 18:57:36 +0000
From: "Orit Levin (LCA)" <oritl@microsoft.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "uta@ietf.org" <uta@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Uta] Proposed list of deliverables
Thread-Index: Ac8UDfYmUjL7spWFRWi+szgpg2cFIgM+kacAAABVyMAAAeZtAAAACiCA
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:57:35 +0000
Message-ID: <2fb5c84c11694c29bf9621481248c902@BL2PR03MB290.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <0bc674da169f4772b0fb2173ed679115@BY2PR03MB300.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <52EFD694.5010405@stpeter.im> <0b0789ddea34437fbf26e9b66cb9dcaf@BL2PR03MB290.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <52EFE594.4000802@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <52EFE594.4000802@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [98.247.123.117]
x-forefront-prvs: 01110342A5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(377454003)(479174003)(51704005)(13464003)(199002)(189002)(24454002)(59766001)(77982001)(79102001)(80022001)(74706001)(69226001)(65816001)(63696002)(74316001)(33646001)(561944002)(66066001)(31966008)(74502001)(74662001)(74876001)(46102001)(74366001)(47446002)(56776001)(76482001)(54316002)(54356001)(53806001)(87936001)(50986001)(4396001)(47976001)(47736001)(49866001)(87266001)(2656002)(80976001)(93136001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(83322001)(76796001)(76576001)(76786001)(94316002)(81686001)(15975445006)(56816005)(90146001)(83072002)(51856001)(85306002)(81342001)(92566001)(86362001)(81542001)(93516002)(85852003)(81816001)(94946001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB291; H:BL2PR03MB290.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:98.247.123.117; FPR:B66AF629.AF3A84D6.7F7B71A4.50623A51.20262; InfoNoRecordsA:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Proposed list of deliverables
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:57:39 -0000

Agreed 100%. 
The question now is, would Yaron and/or you take the lead and come up with a specific proposal (or better a new version) in the next few days?
Orit.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im]
> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 10:53 AM
> To: Orit Levin (LCA); uta@ietf.org
> Cc: Pete Resnick; Barry Leiba
> Subject: Re: [Uta] Proposed list of deliverables
> 
> On 2/3/14, 11:41 AM, Orit Levin (LCA) wrote:
> 
> >>> 2. Applications' independent document recommending best existing
> >>> and future practices for using TLS (Likely a BCP or a Proposed
> >>> Standard RFC)
> >>
> >> I think draft-sheffer-tls-bcp is a good starting point for this
> >> deliverable.
> >>
> >
> > More specifically, section 4 of this draft "enriched" with the recent
> > discussion points and recommendations from the list.
> 
> IMHO we might want to address a slightly wider range of topics, or at
> least organized the current information so it's a bit easier to find
> particular recommendations about things like certificate validation, key
> length, unauthenticated encryption, SNI, compression, session
> resumption, etc. Actually it would be good to have a list of the topics
> about which we want to have recommendations, too
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email