Re: [Uta] Review of, and recommendation to adopt, draft-tschofenig-uta-tls13-profile
Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> Thu, 04 April 2019 06:24 UTC
Return-Path: <loganaden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uta@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43001120338 for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 23:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q_CvMfV-HnDo for <uta@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 23:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x132.google.com (mail-it1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7A38120320 for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 23:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x132.google.com with SMTP id u65so1881054itc.2 for <uta@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 23:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fuZMKU7FU69QkDCqqvxz0V//s+U10yq4v8vqnKqTu2k=; b=q9MFm6XBTFDtzFcRnM0m2qDrtz2WJAozxfRB/Nv3V3PsL1HUCIWmOZIBU94Fv2cRaL AiV3CeRInQXclDsOEa4jX/rxc4RoFiTRDaeRXEjDyXcDu6Hbd+Rn2FiZEnmkK/vHlW80 nDU+hbbA+EVPUUqIRPwmqcfRGuMTlbPOmHSdJpodvpoqJd4UtK43vr7O8e9FiV6GIlf3 fk1+ZO9aQxTJfCIiZZKBAAmVo6LmoKV6EFW8M2NWKoT8sqMLIPcvpLHrquHiU+0FO67g Kqs/z87xDaBqg/rMwdBitJ8Xpjba/m3qpvoND2OEAaGrkXvfXjhDlD91rudzKLJZWHhV 8Wxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fuZMKU7FU69QkDCqqvxz0V//s+U10yq4v8vqnKqTu2k=; b=Xi+m6wW11NrzpmnVCjbTo1oJtVlR4LD1ozAQGoSqlmBCHkzDg7ySf28q7AhPPdA5Ik ONJzJXoMMsjNSjO++fZCl8rWLFZxg6qEMSV1wzkUhw4l5ya+/7NpBbzKhg7GTu8esRwe VAbO42eEHYeoumKNg2/Ophu8LRzIoDdbklc5FQupNUcBF2SVHuXH7L7q9QsszUQ3do7P ma2RJWgK+L16ScAciiUErlf2CPMAq8mStgMzGFHdTPzVnqAzWUdGH11kkNDbF5oDrcbl 1EUP4W5jWzb4RVL4UxM6xJtFyNl+8gWZr1Cq69Jdoe74BHFghkc2CILngCFGdn6Wgh3Z oFjg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW1GbiYeKF+m4QIrO52JB3PXUohzRCJQxOyw7rcbNKNMcjL8OjN 1rFckrNNCzT2xXDsgNqECSJi1unQZ4LkN/K2yvU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwtgCzzCTDmTzNkl4PmM8RYz09aowGvJjo3Z31FvfvE4G2au6EuSmtxwGeEZnSGshBfKywy3w5TfBtJg37IuHs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:660c:288:: with SMTP id s8mr896310itl.36.1554359062015; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 23:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+V7iU+u2ykKHjeUzs_JJHq32YGK9A-TEfzOKY7kibedA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ+V7iU+u2ykKHjeUzs_JJHq32YGK9A-TEfzOKY7kibedA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 10:24:10 +0400
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwQPTgVcmpK+5H9MdSdEL-U3Zx+4fjd1gQKgd7tjB901AA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Cc: uta@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uta/Kwvg-WtGnLwjBoC5BrBFh-_W9fg>
Subject: Re: [Uta] Review of, and recommendation to adopt, draft-tschofenig-uta-tls13-profile
X-BeenThere: uta@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: UTA working group mailing list <uta.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uta/>
List-Post: <mailto:uta@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta>, <mailto:uta-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 06:24:24 -0000
Introduction, 3rd paragraph: "TLS 1.3 has been re-designed and several previously defined extensions are not applicable to the new version of TLS/DTLS anymore" I think that this could be improved a bit, as it gives the impression that there was a previous version of TLS 1.3. Something like "TLS 1.3 has been designed differently compared to previous versions of TLS. Therefore several previously defined extensions are not applicable to the new version of TLS/DTLS anymore". Secton 4: error handling: "... important for a developer to find out from situation situation ..." I think that the 2nd use of "situation" is not needed. Overall, I support adoption of this document. Section 9. Timeouts I'm curious about the choice of 9 seconds. Is there a reason behind choosing this value ? If there is, then I think that there should be an explanation and a link.
- [Uta] Review of, and recommendation to adopt, dra… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Uta] Review of, and recommendation to adopt,… Loganaden Velvindron