[Uuidrev] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9562 (8288)
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 09 February 2025 16:48 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: uuidrev@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uuidrev@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12772C1D3DE2 for <uuidrev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 08:48:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bGpasAqNFHWi for <uuidrev@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 08:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE193C1D3DC6 for <uuidrev@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 08:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: relay.sandelman.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=sandelman.ca header.i=@sandelman.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dyas header.b=YuVnOEh1; dkim-atps=neutral
Received: from dyas.sandelman.ca (unknown [142.169.16.214]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83EED1F4A4; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:48:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 94348A1A68; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:48:09 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=dyas; t=1739119689; bh=QbwVTM5+lyqddi1mBXGFMIYMHw83sJr4BS4T3PW1eYc=; h=From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:References:Date:From; b=YuVnOEh1aJYnojha8fICH6Q1s6KqwmY74IPsJYM6QuPICRVBznc5q5Qqt6OPYI6Eo UUFzHaj96SmuPYeO5pwIoSpF0aX884jV3sQP+wn5CtWKMTZf9HYOukCCf54mm7MBnY s1ZvdK5vQrRBtMnHcMoxh9E+LAeQ1VCKGsvVS9hNEsXTvMtjS05jCy4B3rxjgG45eo jUnoLfCokRXB4gp3Ka0/CFeg67nAsR160aT9KjLsbLnv4NFL24tlF4wcZiwFK9pAaJ VwVWFj0kMdtAC0CERqR6zQfbi0Lek0yCVY/bzwUuoB/k331mQsIcrMHS+q17IjbSb/ 7xxlR4/tOrTJA==
Received: from dyas (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dyas.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90690A1A67; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:48:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: kydavis@cisco.com, brad@peabody.io, pjl7@uw.edu, superuser@gmail.com, orie@transmute.industries, fenton@bluepopcorn.net, nathanmcgarvey@gmail.com, uuidrev@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20250208220238.93E622199B3@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
References: <20250208220238.93E622199B3@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Comments: In-reply-to RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> message dated "Sat, 08 Feb 2025 14:02:38 -0800."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 11:48:09 -0500
Message-ID: <1042276.1739119689@dyas>
Message-ID-Hash: Y3RTHWBUJAGRMOWE2V6MCEFEZQTCPW52
X-Message-ID-Hash: Y3RTHWBUJAGRMOWE2V6MCEFEZQTCPW52
X-MailFrom: mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Uuidrev] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9562 (8288)
List-Id: Revise Universally Unique Identifier Definitions <uuidrev.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uuidrev/qMFPq-m_CpFcA9ywuxqjpZzaWgM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uuidrev>
List-Help: <mailto:uuidrev-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:uuidrev-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:uuidrev@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:uuidrev-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:uuidrev-leave@ietf.org>
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 60-bit timestamp valid until 5623 AD; UUIDv7 features a 48-bit
> Corrected Text
> 60-bit timestamp valid until 5236 AD; UUIDv7 features a 48-bit
> Notes
> -----
> I believe the error is the result of a bad calculation that used the
> Unix epoch as the zero-date instead of the Gregorian calendar's 1582
> zero-date. I've seen online references to the following [incorrect]
okay.
Kyzer, Brad, Paul, do you concur?
If so, tell Orie to approve the edits.
I think it's sort-of-technical, but also sort of editorial, as I don't
anticipate any of us being alive between 5236 and 5623 to deal with this problem.
It also kinda looks like a dyslexic typo, since the digits are permutted.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
- [Uuidrev] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9562… Michael Richardson