IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v4v6interim] "IPv4->IPv6 is hard"

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 17 October 2008 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7483A6AD9; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7EB3A6AD9 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p7BjzHk4bYSt for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025FF3A6A57 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.33,434,1220227200"; d="scan'208";a="109389613"
Received: from sj-dkim-2.cisco.com ([171.71.179.186]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2008 20:22:30 +0000
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9HKMUCq002180; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:22:30 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9HKMTvZ011287; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:22:29 GMT
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:22:29 -0700
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-220.cisco.com ([10.32.244.220]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:22:29 -0700
Message-Id: <B4CCC195-FD5A-4260-AF60-4B74D5532D52@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <48F8E52A.3080009@sri.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:22:29 -0700
References: <B4A9FAB9-F39D-42AA-BE3B-AF6A3C48CC93@cisco.com> <4391DDA1-6432-4DCD-8A38-F351C68058B5@muada.com> <48F8A9F9.6000505@sri.com> <48F8BC64.10608@psg.com> <48F8D984.90901@sri.com> <48F8DB10.6000800@psg.com> <48F8E52A.3080009@sri.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Oct 2008 20:22:29.0570 (UTC) FILETIME=[14026A20:01C93096]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=525; t=1224274950; x=1225138950; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim2002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; z=From:=20Fred=20Baker=20<fred@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[v4v6interim]=20=22IPv4->IPv6=20is=20ha rd=22 |Sender:=20; bh=9edZGcti5X2oA4jTr71zDQWvJrzj/fsUfi1DhF/BAR0=; b=lJxAgRgzO6QfbYRG4ezTJsRppDFVoR8a0iJ+A4HKqNwRAN7Z+r7d/hDojS fP/5QMAbzDa4UYIuOxLtFGRY9bl0/G/oJiL2sC4b9M6m3ULjITTinupOXYr/ KgI6pf5vP5;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=fred@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; );
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] "IPv4->IPv6 is hard"
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

On Oct 17, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Ed Jankiewicz wrote:

> Of course, that doesn't take p2p into account where everyone is a  
> server, but there should be other ways for those folks to find each  
> other.

I think that it isn't necessary to consider every p2p application  
instance a "server". As I noted this morning, they will naturally  
resolve a lot of that. And to the extent that they don't, that becomes  
a reason to deploy dual stack, which is what we have been recommending  
for some time now anyway.
_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email