Re: [v4v6interim] "IPv4->IPv6 is hard"

Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn> Mon, 20 October 2008 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490993A68F4; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DF8B3A68F4 for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.638
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.638 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.873, BAYES_40=-0.185, FH_HAS_XAIMC=2.696]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uuY4GFUOi6yd for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:17:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cernet.edu.cn (sea.net.edu.cn [202.112.3.66]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E73043A68F3 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 00:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1]([59.66.24.169]) by cernet.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id jm3348fc47da; Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:19:05 +0800
Message-ID: <48FC30EC.50609@cernet.edu.cn>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:19:08 +0800
From: Xing Li <xing@cernet.edu.cn>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <B4A9FAB9-F39D-42AA-BE3B-AF6A3C48CC93@cisco.com> <4391DDA1-6432- 4DCD-8A38-F351C68058B5@muada.com><0F551636-8059-4C93-81F6-AB5421CD4F3F@cisco.com> <48FBC96D.5020207@cernet.edu.cn> <48FC2AFC.60405@it.uc3m.es> <F2C58F5B-4A97-4F86-8987-832F41424D6E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F2C58F5B-4A97-4F86-8987-832F41424D6E@cisco.com>
X-AIMC-AUTH: xing
X-AIMC-MAILFROM: xing@cernet.edu.cn
X-AIMC-Msg-ID: jEfCprUB
Cc: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v4v6interim] "IPv4->IPv6 is hard"
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

Fred Baker 写道:
>
> On Oct 20, 2008, at 2:53 PM, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
>>> (2) As the ISP, we price IVI addresses (1:1 mapping of IPv4 address, 
>>> scarce resource) and non-IVI addresses (non-scarce resource) 
>>> differently. So it is also economically reasonable.
>> Right, this is exactly what i would like to prevent, that ISPs have 
>> control on whether their clients are able or not to publish content 
>> from their sites
>
> Excuse me?
>
> Trust me, given that you attach to someone's network, they are in 
> control of what services they offer you, and they are in a position to 
> filter-or-whatever if they want. Given that you have a choice of 
> offerings, they are not in control of the choices you make, but they 
> can prevent you from making certain choices in their network by not 
> offering you the choice.
>
> What Xing Li proposes - and what I propose - is not as onerous as you 
> appear to believe. He gives you the option of paying for a directly 
> (1:1) translatable address and he doesn't tell you what you may do 
> with it. Given that, you have the option of paying for the service he 
> is offering or paying for a different one, perhaps one from a 
> different ISP - the same choice you have with any ISP. Given that you 
> choose to pay for a 1:1 translatable address (just as you would with 
> the NAT64 model), you can put any content behind that address that you 
> want to.
>
> And in any event, I would really hope that we could avoid political 
> agendas here. Last I checked, we're technologists and we are 
> describing technology. Pretending that we are preventing ISPs from 
> doing one thing or forcing them to do another is a pipe dream. Once it 
> is deployed, they're in control.
>
> Let's work on the technology.
Agree. We are working on technology and provide feasible solutions. The 
market will make the decision. xing
>
>

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim