IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v4v6interim] Comparison document

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Tue, 16 September 2008 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: v4v6interim-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v4v6interim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581AA3A696F; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136C63A696F for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.653
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.653 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.946, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id grDi691gbOhn for <v4v6interim@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com (sj-iport-1.cisco.com [171.71.176.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF413A67D2 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2008 15:45:07 +0000
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com (sj-core-4.cisco.com [171.68.223.138]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m8GFj7Vj009800 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:45:07 -0700
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.32.240.194]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8GFj6p5006544 for <v4v6interim@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:45:06 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: v4v6interim@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:45:06 -0700
Message-ID: <079901c91813$31733990$b3736b80@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Thread-Index: AckYEzFBfUvC/LZVRbWzVgio52KMVA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=280; t=1221579907; x=1222443907; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Comparison=20document |Sender:=20; bh=2uOd5XaJ4gINXJwB+dh/M/Eia7sIP2Ll9X2e38p5TXw=; b=av26zuNo3pivtyCqN/qg1xd5JgkpCFrbhi072QmWdgfVlZLd++/PJLATBj Wkj/S/rmt/4dF+fhzUszhlbEOimYd7Jg0uAmc3nwdoh8l6KF90kQ0h4byBUq od0zcZeAybIZuJFYFEUEnSY7VRIq3OdbKw3aMC0QWY/x4evZ3QQPg=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Subject: [v4v6interim] Comparison document
X-BeenThere: v4v6interim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of coexistence topics for the 01-Oct-2008 v4-v6 coexistence interim meeting <v4v6interim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/v4v6interim>
List-Post: <mailto:v4v6interim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim>, <mailto:v4v6interim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v4v6interim-bounces@ietf.org

We just submitted "A Comparison of Proposals to Replace NAT-PT", which
attempts to summarize and compare APB-Revised, Dual-Stack Lite, NAT444, IVI,
NAT6, NAT64, NAT-PT, and sNAT-PT.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wing-nat-pt-replacement-comparison-0
0.txt

-d

_______________________________________________
v4v6interim mailing list
v4v6interim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v4v6interim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email