Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-li-v6ops-load-balancing-requirement-00.txt

Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net> Tue, 05 July 2011 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EA721F85F0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 06:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4Ow21Uba1Ow for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 06:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from globis01.globis.net (mail.globis.net [87.195.182.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6F321F86C3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 06:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D0F87007D; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:38:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at globis01.globis.net
Received: from globis01.globis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.globis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WmOqJ7c4plJ0; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:38:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Rays-iMac.local (unknown [192.168.0.3]) (Authenticated sender: Ray.Hunter@globis.net) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E187C870021; Tue, 5 Jul 2011 15:38:00 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E1313B8.8060006@globis.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:38:00 +0200
From: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
User-Agent: Postbox Express 1.0.1 (Macintosh/20100705)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:39:23 -0700
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-li-v6ops-load-balancing-requirement-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:38:38 -0000

Thanks for sharing your draft with us.

I think you may be missing a whole class of bottleneck that is not 
receiving too much attention at the moment.

Many enterprises transport the majority of their traffic over the 
boundary between their 'private' internal networks and the Internet via 
use of a "web proxy."

Application Level Gateways (ALG) = RFC2766 Section 2.4 are also 
considered a valid translation mechanism between IPv4 and IPv6 islands, 
and can be especially useful for simple outbound HTTP based web traffic. 
They may also be useful for translating certain inbound requests.

Traditionally the WCCP Web Cache Proxy Protocol (non IETF protocol, but 
described in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilson-wrec-wccp-v2-01) 
has been used to balance requests between multiple proxies, or for 
example between an IPv4 router and a farm of multiple WAN acceleration 
devices.

AFAIK WCCPv2 does not (yet) support IPv6, which IMHO is quite an 
omission in the options given to enterprises to migrate to IPv6 in a 
smooth manner.

regards, and good luck with your deployment,

RayH