IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] combination of NAT64/DNS64 and NAT44

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Wed, 17 April 2013 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C3421E803F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.372, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CG+d7PkufGKN for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C518721E803D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 07:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1BC789E; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:48:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F159A; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:48:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:48:42 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <516EB4EC.7010102@viagenie.ca>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1304171646450.23668@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1304171206080.23668@uplift.swm.pp.se> <516EB4EC.7010102@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] combination of NAT64/DNS64 and NAT44
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:48:43 -0000

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Simon Perreault wrote:

> It might not be immediately useful to you, but you should know about this 
> draft:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-nat64-discovery-heuristic

Yep. Also RFC6877, but my guess would be that the 464XLAT would be 
disabled when WAN port is dual stack?

> Other than that, my main feedback would be: you want to provide NATed 
> IPv4 alongside NAT64, doesn't that defeat the purpose of NAT64, i.e. 
> operating an IPv6-only network?

I want all kinds of terminals to be supported using single APN. I don't 
want to care if the device connects using DS or single stack IPv4 or IPv6.

I don't control the end devices.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email