IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Review of 'draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn-02.txt'

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 11 September 2009 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04973A688F for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.905, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kDCKN2aL-z+V for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBA93A68D0 for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Mlvpb-000Gt6-Jt for v6ops-data0@psg.com; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:25:47 +0000
Received: from [209.85.216.185] (helo=mail-px0-f185.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>) id 1MlvN6-000CP9-B9 for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:00:20 +0000
Received: by pxi15 with SMTP id 15so538494pxi.25 for <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rvJM6szBibWrBSEQTOI4UplosI6LUROKbkQxBn1OQD0=; b=xxidPgbXa8L9bI4u7GSmc7T1jpTXvYzrLVRob8cfcvM4GyNMfitas1y6oV55N3Vq2g kwXWjvkouWTSmh3DAY1osoo4Bkd3FQY1nuw9TUn8SXNSCTDm5JTkt+xvDmsnUNl1GaXU QRqQReARK8CxoMwnkkMm0nfmn9j8WAQ3K+5rY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=BWJjiuGh+2lCcZoP9Aqmzy5w7KkUZEbgOENypAtbJ0PHsbaRKMvTYzr6dQ7Yqy1OAc wxaqZROnR4AvQM+nMhXAswgBI+lfqHfRJEWeDgbyR7ixnkjM8ug2S7/DlZiI5VMS0RzW zeSaaQuOMqcabt2U7ufZ0iMziTGOD+/GfgJOc=
Received: by 10.115.66.24 with SMTP id t24mr4243482wak.39.1252634179536; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1774677pxi.7.2009.09.10.18.56.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4AA9AE40.50004@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:56:16 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
CC: shengjiang@huawei.com, v6ops <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, guoseu@huawei.com
Subject: Re: Review of 'draft-jiang-v6ops-incremental-cgn-02.txt'
References: <31484.26522.qm@web45503.mail.sp1.yahoo.com><39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A106555B38@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com><373420.97768.qm@web45509.mail.sp1.yahoo.com><39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A106599177@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com><39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A106599A1A@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com> <58C86C6B78A448A890D98A311A60BBC1@JiangXiong> <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1065D807A@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A1065D807A@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <v6ops.ops.ietf.org>

On 2009-09-09 05:12, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Hi Sheng,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sheng Jiang [mailto:shengjiang@huawei.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, September 06, 2009 3:52 PM

...
> Thanks for considering the input. On point 5), however,
> it should be OK to talk about MTU without using words that
> could be construed as normative. For example, the original
> text could be reworded slightly as follows:
>  
>    "However, for IPv6 traffic, a user behind the DS HG will
>     see normal IPv6 service. We therefore observe that an
>     IPv6 tunnel MTU of at least 1500 bytes would ensure that
>     the mechanism does not cause excessive fragmentation of
>     IPv6 traffic nor excessive IPv6 path MTU discovery
>     interactions."

I think that this should be said. Operational people will get the
message without the need for normative text.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email