Re: [v6ops] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6092 (6979)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Tue, 24 May 2022 05:54 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44539C07C395 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 22:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D59k3aX-I40l for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 22:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15D4BC07C393 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2022 22:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar25.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4L6k1K6lJzz8stl; Tue, 24 May 2022 07:54:45 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1653371685; bh=2pv0/V6FRNPIoceh66dw965ICxrRBehiee5Dm0+FDME=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=DsmdZV1+T3mtgJcXVxoASbm4RzVqOjQD9QkAJzfPrmW3juvits7WmC6BOK/YmJgpU 5iJL4Wj9rIx+gguAECHsNB/9jNWET7AGiObpChGwy6IBRyEMOKv8k//TnBtvFMGuYF LnasulgTnlLNVU67zYSdNqaiXiTXCBRBo1/4cBucj3t5laBlXTe/+HcdnyO4m2YE5+ IFe2QzWDmHgEZawRcH1p3/WxvvMz8Qbhcq0GHJtb5w/F8lVo4aAt+uDKKZNL9cCa1W z2kcyJOvbDM6585mges9681/ml9bywQMhxrUm83bxKE81gr4qmcbZ6XH2Gl9Fc+Jnv /nDcUy84Xqh7A==
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
CC: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "jhw@apple.com" <jhw@apple.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6092 (6979)
Thread-Index: AQHYby/pbcZpG8UJ4E2w195cDkDOP60thgXA
Content-Class:
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 05:54:45 +0000
Message-ID: <31207_1653371685_628C7325_31207_489_1_6754b7b25e294d88845685d9b98b2943@orange.com>
References: <20220524053348.4CC18F5D82@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220524053348.4CC18F5D82@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2022-05-24T05:50:46Z; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=fece0dec-c263-43da-8ddb-132ceb0a8e5c; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0
x-originating-ip: [10.115.27.51]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/1dYAPXOkkzsIGgPTPU031mSK9UE>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6092 (6979)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 05:54:52 -0000

Hi all, 

The original text is correct. It does not refer to the name of the message, but to the descriptive process.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de RFC Errata
> System
> Envoyé : mardi 24 mai 2022 07:34
> À : rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Cc : v6ops@ietf.org; jhw@apple.com
> Objet : [v6ops] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6092 (6979)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6092,
> "Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in Customer Premises
> Equipment (CPE) for Providing Residential IPv6 Internet Service".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6979
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Tomoyuki Sahara <tsahara@iij.ad.jp>
> 
> Section: 3.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    REC-9: Inbound DHCPv6 discovery packets [RFC3315] received on
>    exterior interfaces MUST NOT be processed by any integrated
> DHCPv6
>    server or relay agent.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    REC-9: Inbound DHCPv6 Solicit messages [RFC3315] received on
>    exterior interfaces MUST NOT be processed by any integrated
> DHCPv6
>    server or relay agent.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> "discovery" packet, more precisely DHCPDISCOVER message, is
> defined in DHCPv4 but it is not defined in DHCPv6.
> DHCPv6 clients send "Solicit" messages to discover DHCPv6 servers
> or relay agents.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary,
> please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log
> in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6092 (draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-simple-security-16)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Recommended Simple Security Capabilities in
> Customer Premises Equipment (CPE) for Providing Residential IPv6
> Internet Service
> Publication Date    : January 2011
> Author(s)           : J. Woodyatt, Ed.
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : IPv6 Operations
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.