Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-04.txt

Hi Jordi, Gabor, all,

Thank you for taking into account the various comments. 

However, I see that the wording:

"Often NAT64 vendors support direct communication .."

and 

"Some AFTR vendors support direct .."

made it to the public version while there is no evidence to back these claims. 

I'm uncomfortable to include such claims in the draft and, thus, reiterate the suggestion to be factual: include what a technology is designed to provide no what some specific implems are doing. 

Thank you.   

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Envoyé : lundi 23 mai 2022 21:51
> À : i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc : v6ops@ietf.org
> Objet : I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-04.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition
> Technologies for IPv4aaS
>         Authors         : Gabor Lencse
>                           Jordi Palet Martinez
>                           Lee Howard
>                           Richard Patterson
>                           Ian Farrer
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-
> 04.txt
> 	Pages           : 35
> 	Date            : 2022-05-23
> 
> Abstract:
>    Several IPv6 transition technologies have been developed to
> provide
>    customers with IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS) for ISPs with an
> IPv6-only
>    access and/or core network.  All these technologies have their
>    advantages and disadvantages, and depending on existing
> topology,
>    skills, strategy and other preferences, one of these
> technologies may
>    be the most appropriate solution for a network operator.
> 
>    This document examines the five most prominent IPv4aaS
> technologies
>    considering a number of different aspects to provide network
>    operators with an easy-to-use reference to assist in selecting
> the
>    technology that best suits their needs.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-
> comparison/
> 
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-
> comparison-04
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-
> comparison-04
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.