IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Working Group Last Call for <draft-ietf-6man-grand-03.txt>

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 19 September 2020 02:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C16F3A0AAF; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q1YPSMYbXhTE; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:20:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CBA53A0A26; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (desktop4.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.16]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBC61F45B; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 02:20:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id DB1A41A022D; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:20:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <8AC30419-4F45-4E56-BBCF-F04D4D0FF8D4@gmail.com>
References: <160022348671.28445.8378620622786303015@ietfa.amsl.com> <8AC30419-4F45-4E56-BBCF-F04D4D0FF8D4@gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> message dated "Fri, 18 Sep 2020 10:07:25 -0700."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:20:06 -0400
Message-ID: <118107.1600482006@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/4bwKW2PO_c9sdTPEU4yz4c6R8cM>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Working Group Last Call for <draft-ietf-6man-grand-03.txt>
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 02:20:12 -0000

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
    > as a Proposed Standard.  As noted earlier, we are doing a second
    > working group last call because the Area Directors requested that this
    > draft be combined with <draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-cache-init>.  This version
    > of the draft does that.  V6ops is being copied on this last call.

I have read multiple versions of this document, including this version.

As well I have read a few versions of nd-cache-init.
I made some comments on a thread about nd-cache-init today, being confused
about the merger.  My comments were mostly curious questions, and probably do
not require any changes to the document.

I initially thought that some content was lost in the merge, but upon
re-reading carefully, it all seems to be there.

Wunderbar!

-- 
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email