Re: [v6ops] Suresh Krishnan's Yes on draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-06: (with COMMENT)

[Suresh Krishnan <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lorenzo,
  The changes look good. Thanks for taking care of these issues.

Regards
Suresh

On 05/26/2016 12:04 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> Suresh,
> 
> thanks for the comments. We've addressed them in -07.
> 
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Suresh Krishnan
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
> 
>     * What is the term ePDG being used here? Can you please add a reference?
>     The well known term in mobile networks is Evolved Packet Data Gateway
>     that is used for IPsec tunnel termination. That does not seem to make
>     sense here.
> 
> 
> Good catch. Clarified to:
> 
>       particularly for
>       technologies like I-WLAN [TS.24327] where the two processors share
>       the Wi-Fi network connection.
> 
> Better?
> 
>     * Maybe worth adding a reference to RFC7278 (64share) here as an example
>     for "Extending the network (e.g., "tethering")."
> 
> 
> We do cite RFC7278 elsewhere. Not sure a reference is needed here, since it's
> not the only way of doing tethering.
>  
> 
>     s/which is only available in 3GPP release 10/which is only available in
>     3GPP release 10 onwards/
> 
> 
> Done.
>  
> 
>     It is not clear what this bullet means. Can you clarify?
> 
>     "  o  Uncertainty, because it is not known in advance if a particular
>           operation function will be available."
> 
> 
> Clarified to "Uncertainty, because it is not known if a particular operation
> function will be available until the provisioning operation succeeds or fails."


> 
> Regards,
> Lorenzo