Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-vasilenko-v6ops-ipv6-oversized-analysis-00.txt

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 April 2021 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D3D3A1604 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jQCGwVUwZzx for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com (mail-pg1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4EC33A1606 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id q10so9819011pgj.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=of7rt3amZZRSsDtC485wAvEMU4iMFP1TCtYk1DU2gCA=; b=hSqX814zSFrPzL8xPCJs4kGuO7TzrgliJH5+8JeBTaBItDL9PTWipjkOtsd/4E9pdd 1Qix0v1Rm35ALUeC1raK8Gn55UkKlNQ23UQne3sGGBZKlb9zxwu8SNd6l7oWlnw5kIDS QB8fvzqu43poLLSYfG3itfsZQ98/Dkedqi2RHxjbP06P+CUop/yat5Vf0uc79klTAxAk 253N1OURijZzv4L9+TUvGzmGaP00B4MENM3ItJ+l7uPzKCPVoB9AzKLR3E4TCzIETybM WNSVImBYdv3AaGbyQh8876FIT0BX482sS8YOydTUqqmCwRzKriOf6c26w2P45K6e0j5F j03A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=of7rt3amZZRSsDtC485wAvEMU4iMFP1TCtYk1DU2gCA=; b=p+IX9wthdqCgmCsixKofOzPdkLyTS163HzUEgn3g8Mz8CfYQOSzhyOC/deofw67ZyS QpOvnjWTMOwa8ZQo/aE4raAlrMRRA1Ki9s04fPY6Sz45sFxmfhYUc6wbTojVDgHj1tDy K4RmhQlH0W7mVmdDn/S5FWZeS6l5lLxi+WP6tFHL6skm5vd1kzkxpiUyvuLuYNKTzHtn 4EkV6XhIjc/MpV7aDTMnOo1O8FCkiq16Pwcj1kogRx765OU0fdJsmQmiMkR2QY1kcB9X upDzi51m838PHjVD2Rz07mNUVbjuzww5R00VxXd7QxcG4ZHw2k6V72rWntI0mhonZXkx ntnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53120M+iEer7TVfN6Xbtqyy8vOkIHl9tpoPBgKMPaWfh2PSR7k2k zUSxK7NxyOx0IA7BZEbz43g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJymYnICnHhYC4zytP61531p/i1ZncWlQHAoJUp6l9Bsy1PlIBozP+NfKMhr6n5qJ9HgqkV1GA==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:952c:0:b029:1f1:533c:40d7 with SMTP id c12-20020aa7952c0000b02901f1533c40d7mr26858881pfp.81.1617697128248; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:18:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (ip72-205-75-17.sb.sd.cox.net. [72.205.75.17]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s19sm17731305pfh.168.2021.04.06.01.18.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <B8CCF690-6FEC-4455-A9E0-43E80C11CAA1@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E8B38FAE-890D-4600-870C-6C389F63D7F0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:18:46 -0700
In-Reply-To: <0c8fa84f22334932961238d715f9f031@huawei.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
References: <161618441098.16707.1272808535936578483@ietfa.amsl.com> <067e2750-b212-4dc5-23b4-ada2060ca0d2@gmail.com> <0c8fa84f22334932961238d715f9f031@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/50zHCnMwc3qRJQuG7ftR7c0riZ0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-vasilenko-v6ops-ipv6-oversized-analysis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 08:18:54 -0000


> On Mar 23, 2021, at 2:48 AM, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> And if the network should have redesign for SRv6 anyway then why not increase MTU at the same time?

I suspect that there will be issues in that which IEEE 802 needs to respond to.