Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

hsyu <hsyu@cfiec.net> Tue, 06 April 2021 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <hsyu@cfiec.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D90D3A1622 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.019
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOTGOV_IMAGE=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, IP_LINK_PLUS=0.012, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR=1.242, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8_CiOPIPU9VZ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpbg519.qq.com (smtpbg516.qq.com [203.205.250.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392353A161F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-QQ-mid: bizesmtp23t1617697255tdaenb13
Received: from DESKTOP-3U2VLEE (unknown [121.69.40.129]) by esmtp6.qq.com (ESMTP) with id ; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 16:20:51 +0800 (CST)
X-QQ-SSF: 00400000002000909000B00A0000000
X-QQ-FEAT: IJTqyPTPEkCydh+tIGxSRHpmkH0Avmn7cO0n+WZgW8AKn9n783dyzvf9/ktlf 9KjQ8t4NOMztyFD00UACiUYaukmLZoxofsKs1ZU7UDLQMERUKzo3340zBjNeR3zcaPb9/yE bgOpOz9n+yMsE+2HjjKBXtOr0tgKb7d30WNt1LW8LVD9IuvWnKAxb+t7ra6N3D67i3shOOj jD/YA4UlCmx3I3+bRXMwWs9Y2ilc8lHIOCfS65YJy++VzxC22j87KRvgORY6ErAY/gfbIyd STh5yf+BddE4bsbvnrzAt+H8uJuI7EXodgk4XaYzfA1WzYDao6GN5PJiZcW+XOqbUSMmR7T 8Hh3NjSWcjt0Yr9ODlWfZl+M2pZrrkmDEbFMpI3
X-QQ-GoodBg: 2
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 16:20:49 +0800
From: hsyu <hsyu@cfiec.net>
To: =?utf-8?Q?fredbaker.ietf=40gmail.com?= <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: =?utf-8?Q?dhruv.ietf=40gmail.com?= <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, =?utf-8?Q?rbonica=40juniper.net?= <rbonica@juniper.net>, =?utf-8?Q?v6ops=40ietf.org?= <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <3F5984A2-5262-43D5-80D7-714AF18F4C2C@cfiec.net>+152F665602EF3AC7
In-Reply-To: <4EE06946-1F29-4C2C-A8B9-98FC2BD96396@gmail.com>
References: <BL0PR05MB5316425C5650B5D2FE43DE4DAE6C9@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAB75xn4ioyzQ5AvUrPKVyuybjZRV__Tv1OMs70Lm-z9bo1Eo6g@mail.gmail.com> <74d6dca7019f44aba09caf47ef703e2f@huawei.com> <CAB75xn7=swhtwqRuV6SoWoMO7jtCcPCc02XiVpAjE=VUx8CyaQ@mail.gmail.com> <60598973.1c69fb81.4425f.aedeSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <4EE06946-1F29-4C2C-A8B9-98FC2BD96396@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MailMasterPC/4.15.2.1005 (Windows 10 19H2)
X-CUSTOM-MAIL-MASTER-SENT-ID: 5FB82A2A-B052-4C84-8F2B-16DF707C8692
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-QQ-SENDSIZE: 520
Feedback-ID: bizesmtp:cfiec.net:qybgweb:qybgweb11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/GN8hzQx1xLGbnrgBnuxFB-Y8Fq0>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 08:22:04 -0000

On 4/6/2021 15:13Fred Baker<fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks. To be perfectly honest, I'd be far more impressed if the CGI link contained an IPv6 address :-) But I take it this is intended as input to draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment?

On Mar 22, 2021, at 11:21 PM, hsyu <hsyu@cfiec.net> wrote:

Hi Paolo,
I can also provide some data on the deployment of IPv6 in China.
http://218.2.231.237:5001/cgi-bin/generate

Best regards.


Haisheng Yu(Johnson)
hsyu@cfiec.net
签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制
On 3/23/2021 12:40,Dhruv Dhody<dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Paolo,

I think we should highlight that we do not have visibility inside the enterprises beyond the external-facing website or email and thus it is also difficult to gauge the IPv6 deployments inside enterprises.

[PV] Ok. Probably here you refer to small-medium enterprises. For large enterprises public data on the usage of IPv6 can be retrieved (Nalini, in copy, provided a good input on IPv6 in large organizations). We will better specify this point in the next version of the draft.


I had this NIST data in mind -
https://fedv6-deployment.antd.nist.gov/cgi-bin/generate-com which
includes large enterprises and relies on DNS, mail, external website.
Also, see Eric's site -
https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/detailed.php?country=in

Thanks!
Dhruv

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops