Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Mon, 29 March 2021 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=172215dd68=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40043A1B94 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ci5KrjlnVHxU for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89243A1B9A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1617038535; x=1617643335; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=7jAlpx+X kbeiFHm7OMYGY5e701vtYzqXWWsap+u7IPM=; b=Xvt+2wvbW/2WVHj5m+7dbpVZ Rq74UoTjbaOs5ammO2bkDzZFQemkLsehTNEzsIPHK7L1TYeEcF4TOQkN9pl0//aq vKi4wmji4M3yh41Rp56fcjmGLkXwPtMj0am9ovabKqmnl/l0npvutOQ5iDrrHilN jZsDahzWmeRsBAoTIvQ=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:22:15 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:22:14 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.145] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000560287.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:22:14 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:51bc:4bc3:1db:56d2
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.145]
X-MDArrival-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:22:14 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=172215dd68=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.47.21031401
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:22:10 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "STARK, BARBARA H" <bs7652@att.com>, "'v6ops@ietf.org'" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <5B10E106-A186-4761-A418-A997E03DC194@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
References: <BL0PR05MB5316425C5650B5D2FE43DE4DAE6C9@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <59B5C1F7-48E4-4915-BAAC-41D8ADA29E8F@gmail.com> <18ea74665936408bb33f20630da95311@huawei.com> <E0757B36-8FFB-43A8-8F8B-A7F152F81156@gmail.com> <DM6PR02MB6924475E2A2E02BC0F79C02AC37E9@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB6924475E2A2E02BC0F79C02AC37E9@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7lPeoJ9_Cr3mAt2sXojz7VCV4fI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment and draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 17:22:55 -0000

    > Along the same lines, are there opinions regarding the adoption of draft-vf-
    > v6ops-ipv6-deployment?

    I've looked at this draft and am in favor of adoption. I think it has some very useful and practical information.
    One thing I'd like to mention is that if anyone wants configuration for 464XLAT and lw406 via TR-069,
    this is very simple to achieve. Just tell me what parameters you think are needed (like enable/disable
    and any parameters that need to be configured) and agree to review the proposed additions to TR-181
    (which I would provide by email to specific people or I could liaise to the WG) and it can be in the next 
    release of TR-181 (most likely end of this year).

For all the protocols, I think enable/disable, of course.

I will need to dig into lw4o6, may be the information in RFC8585 is sufficient.

For 464XLAT, I think it could be good to allow the configuration of a specific NAT64 prefix (either the WKP, or the NSP). By default, it should be the WKP.

All those things can be done via other protocols as described in RFC8585, however, TR-069 could be very helpful.

I'm happy to contribute to this work, if required.

As a first step, it will be helpful to understand if DS-LITE, MAP E/T, are already supported (or there is a draft on that), to have a view on how they are supported in order to make the support for lw4o6 and 464XLAT as much "symmetric" as possible.






**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.