Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Tue, 06 April 2021 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=17305b3e54=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928393A1990 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 02:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_LINK_PLUS=0.012, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR=1.242, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a2cxK_m0TqBM for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 02:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2565E3A19A1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 02:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1617703029; x=1618307829; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type; bh=AnrG8bEtVMi1oYOR07VJ1fd5bYnHS0v+Dd d7oMjx3a8=; b=WOiseMHyomGkYh9tTO1fnfm+HFWzOoVtVrzxGOg75AFYAQsXLS 44DaOd/3EOl/Jwbdb9Yid6rcJhBevbnRiNn7WA3lhejUenYCNWNatJIhMrr+OUAk NJDmBLAa98YSCBUmTQNE3ICD66RoJ3YlKbkmDrohCjz4moSpj4R/G916I=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:57:09 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:57:08 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.144] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000565104.msg for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:57:07 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:e54e:9ad5:1f31:4a34
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.144]
X-MDArrival-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:57:07 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=17305b3e54=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: v6ops@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.47.21031401
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:57:06 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <F51F0251-578E-40EA-9A7C-6ECFC8919EE1@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
References: <5D68B6FA-B1D5-4318-9A49-0F8C569332AE@consulintel.es> <<4D4AC472-5EDB-4609-87BD-8ED86ED34CE8@cfiec.net>+2169968E99D14DF2>
In-Reply-To: <<4D4AC472-5EDB-4609-87BD-8ED86ED34CE8@cfiec.net>+2169968E99D14DF2>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3700555026_170417068"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/K69wDR7_b3EhbaH_1JzdWXs-TvI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 09:57:18 -0000

Yes, this works, tks!

 

Anyway, I’m still of the opinion that we should use as much as possible DNS instead of literals :-)

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 6/4/21 11:43, "v6ops en nombre de hsyu" <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de hsyu@cfiec.net> escribió:

 

Because of the firewall, the previous link cannot be accessed. The following link has passed my test without any problems.

 

http://[240e:eb:8001:e00::62]:8000/cgi-bin/generate

 

Haisheng Yu(Johnson)
hsyu@cfiec.net
签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制 

On 4/6/2021 16:48,JORDI PALET MARTINEZ<jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: 

It doesn’t work for me … it may be that PMTUD is filtered?

 

 

 

El 6/4/21 10:22, "v6ops en nombre de hsyu" <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de hsyu@cfiec.net> escribió:

 

Hi, Fred,

 

Sorry for being late, this is the IPv6 access link:

http://[240e:eb:8001:e00::62]:8080/cgi-bin/generate 

 

Haisheng Yu(Johnson)
hsyu@cfiec.net
签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制 

On 4/6/2021 15:13,Fred Baker<fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: 

Thanks. To be perfectly honest, I'd be far more impressed if the CGI link contained an IPv6 address :-) But I take it this is intended as input to draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment?

On Mar 22, 2021, at 11:21 PM, hsyu <hsyu@cfiec.net> wrote:

Hi Paolo,
I can also provide some data on the deployment of IPv6 in China.
http://218.2.231.237:5001/cgi-bin/generate

Best regards.


Haisheng Yu(Johnson)
hsyu@cfiec.net
签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制
On 3/23/2021 12:40,Dhruv Dhody<dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Paolo,

I think we should highlight that we do not have visibility inside the enterprises beyond the external-facing website or email and thus it is also difficult to gauge the IPv6 deployments inside enterprises.

[PV] Ok. Probably here you refer to small-medium enterprises. For large enterprises public data on the usage of IPv6 can be retrieved (Nalini, in copy, provided a good input on IPv6 in large organizations). We will better specify this point in the next version of the draft.


I had this NIST data in mind -
https://fedv6-deployment.antd.nist.gov/cgi-bin/generate-com which
includes large enterprises and relies on DNS, mail, external website.
Also, see Eric's site -
https://www.vyncke.org/ipv6status/detailed.php?country=in

Thanks!
Dhruv

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

 

_______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops 


**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

_______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.