IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] ULA & Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Fri, 10 December 2010 23:28 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3476E28C158 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:28:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.032
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.032 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.567, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-fKD8LeW6no for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:28:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0557128C171 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:28:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joelja-mac.lan (c-98-234-216-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.234.216.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBANTbHT004620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:29:38 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4D02B7E1.3010103@bogus.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:29:37 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <264F5B75-00EF-4495-8D3A-6EB5D653FA06@cisco.com> <20101205170833.08415ad1@opy.nosense.org> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C313066C@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <m239qbkdrm.wl%randy@psg.com> <DBC4C390-383D-4372-8C92-954F0BE59AFB@apple.com> <3DE9301F-A2EB-40EE-ADBC-6C18BA0255FE@cisco.com> <4D01A22D.2060207@gmail.com> <43FE8DB1-697D-4466-91F2-182AAF101874@free.fr> <A0CE02D4-B554-4964-A047-82AA08149A4C@cisco.com> <4D027AEC.80205@bogus.com> <4D027EFF.6090509@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D027EFF.6090509@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] ULA & Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:28:17 -0000

On 12/10/10 11:26 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> How is this different from the bog standard IPv6 situation of running
> several global prefixes on the same network? I don't see that ULAs
> are special.

It's not, my goal was a strawman of real use cases associated with
devices found in the home. I did not advocate for a particular outcome
in so doing.

> draft-troan-multihoming-without-nat66 applies, surely?

certainly.

>     Brian
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email