[v6ops] RFC6204-05: minor adjustment needed

Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com> Thu, 09 February 2012 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A583821F8729 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 05:25:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.150, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l95LLE+Gipdn for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 05:25:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys009aog116.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog116.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FC821F8700 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 05:25:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MOPESEDGE01.eu.thmulti.com ([129.35.174.203]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob116.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTzPJLJ/11pqfEZfBaUebQNvncBroLuMK@postini.com; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:25:01 PST
Received: from MOPESMAILHC02.eu.thmulti.com (141.11.100.29) by mail3.technicolor.com (141.11.253.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:18:53 +0100
Received: from MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com ([169.254.1.201]) by MOPESMAILHC02.eu.thmulti.com ([141.11.100.29]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:18:59 +0100
From: Wuyts Carl <Carl.Wuyts@technicolor.com>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:18:57 +0100
Thread-Topic: RFC6204-05: minor adjustment needed
Thread-Index: AcznLWDTShHdv7DzQ1KmGaz4dca5NQ==
Message-ID: <867F4B6A1672E541A94676D556793ACD0E9AD9CB12@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_867F4B6A1672E541A94676D556793ACD0E9AD9CB12MOPESMBX01eut_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [v6ops] RFC6204-05: minor adjustment needed
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:25:02 -0000

Hi all,

I think a small update is needed for:
G-1:  An IPv6 CE router is an IPv6 node according to the IPv6 Node
         Requirements [RFC4294] specification.
As rfc4294 is being obsolete by RFC6434

Regs
Carl