Re: [v6ops] v6-only (with NAT64) as default network during a conference?

naively, it would be lovely if we could do what an RIR has done, and secure
alternate SIM for use within a limited horizon and price point, which will
do 64XLAT for those of us who have Android 4.x enabled devices.

I don't know if thats possible in all places, but there are Telco's who
seem to be prepared to play nice with us. I feel back in the 802.11b days,
we kind of did this with the loaner-stock cards, and the emerging wifi
network.

otherwise yes, I agree. with some fallback proviso, making the default
NAT64 would be interesting.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> We've had a production quality NAT64 network at the past two IETFs, and
> it's worked wonderfully.   However, some things do break.   In particular,
> Skype doesn't work, and I've heard reports that some Cisco VPN
> implementation doesn't work.   I've found that OpenVPN does work, but needs
> to be configured differently because it can't automatically switch to IPv6
> when IPv4 isn't available—it has to be configured to do one or the other.
>
> If it were up to me, I'd make NAT64 the default and let people switch away
> if they can't make it work, because particularly at an open source
> conference I would expect this to generate a lot of frenetic bug fixing
> rather than a sad migration.   In theory free operating systems ought to do
> IPv6 better, but your milage may, unfortunately, vary.
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>