IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] v6-only (with NAT64) as default network during a conference?

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 22 January 2014 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48041A02F0 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:56:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.913
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.913 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yc_A3KOGTjqK for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C337F1A01F6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ar20so271486iec.10 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:56:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=/6Sxakuf20iuEhkPACcxlQIx/gSSwOFClbL4mXL5qI8=; b=ntyyKDSaaTZZERwlWarw6AUE9R5bBwsh05DPmqEtmTgdOqbfcgsJ3aZHvlQU4LlHQB X8oVWI9rM8JZkPGXd4jFgcSixA/kBHgg9LN11r03DuQchiKDLoc5N+VVswpVT0Cg572d keoeZpceWSDajV86EB2K9lI1szF7mFg7FHJRhL7DSgto2i+7K3QMHhkRPAkqGtCQHU9n Y4zQat3zYwnfWNP38dtni5G6H+/h1z3UQ6X9fgpo7fmc4tscVM/ZSeHMLo1ZbQeLHfhz FlbyqGPsgMkgHAAqfdVG/knn4OPZyQ/TRgP9BMO+MGW/KPSEh8Vz9Fuype0WDLiHtgRj VfEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/6Sxakuf20iuEhkPACcxlQIx/gSSwOFClbL4mXL5qI8=; b=CFsCYGeMAyW0bgGJX0a6O6D2x6NNoILzr4k2lKYjgEs1saK31dnH2GK8pqdIRqEigZ 7KNBiCZGkwwej97Abk5MFuRoOgJUOzcos6pQ3/bGogRF9DJP3QURqP2dmQIMwZ81sDWR /2kuge2dCsQGKBFJq4rPkQoxpH7+HDsGvqnv065pu3jP7vUB+bCyLSUXlELi6BX/hW10 BkMEfQo40Tly67cRuf3lEKg530nuHBgsibM+1zno8xqR7KyyjNdDPuPhXw7ObXaH2Lml skOIWy+eMJCqYDYTEwj7OXlG71f/5Z8H7bYOE9xsWlEUFHxfAeOex4tFOaYhTdGE+enT BKHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnyxVqk94S3m2sGa4z2litYJdihPgGvfr5hIJnRGqOIkK6YcdtkPyVT3YDHGmaZrHv6GRr91KPc0ZO8ig5thPOEXGd5QAehEcxr8ENaiLC7J1ZcEmn0+V+exLRgXx80SRx3QtGb0xwqBd/1U91vOzrbZVvriwywakHRjMnJPdIKsbOsKqkcycTn5sBXhwJC6/yqiUwo
X-Received: by 10.50.36.67 with SMTP id o3mr5471273igj.47.1390431414179; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:56:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:56:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAD77+gReP-weV3=_hz-rm0KvDbDjkmsZYc0H_rdQ=R9qpcNhJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD77+gReP-weV3=_hz-rm0KvDbDjkmsZYc0H_rdQ=R9qpcNhJQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:56:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1fO4PUba60Y5MsUdCEbY_uuGwTBZJQHG6FfjKLj16hMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0116017486fe1404f0970af0"
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6-only (with NAT64) as default network during a conference?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:56:56 -0000

On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Richard Hartmann <
richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> wrote:

> Long story short: Is this feasible today? What problems should we, or
> our users, anticipate? Or should we play it safe, default to
> dual-stack, and not have horror stories about v6 propagate?
>

I guess it depends how much breakage you're willing to accept. Browser
stuff will generally be fine, but some applications (e.g., skype, various
video chat apps, SIP clients, some instant messengers etc. etc.) won't work
at all without IPv4. Some hosts, like Android, don't support IPv6-only
networks at all.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email