IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3849-update-01

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Thu, 07 December 2023 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7504BC15106C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:14:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umn.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3gZTM4dwMgHm for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:13:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta-p8.oit.umn.edu (mta-p8.oit.umn.edu [134.84.196.208]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB8FCC151066 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 12:13:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mta-p8.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4SmQTK3Mrrz9vY6H for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 20:13:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at umn.edu
Received: from mta-p8.oit.umn.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta-p8.oit.umn.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x39CIwvpmqmB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 14:13:57 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mta-p8.oit.umn.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SmQTK0R9qz9vY6S for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 14:13:57 -0600 (CST)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mta-p8.oit.umn.edu 4SmQTK0R9qz9vY6S
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mta-p8.oit.umn.edu 4SmQTK0R9qz9vY6S
Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a1c915eae11so257506166b.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 12:13:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umn.edu; s=google; t=1701980035; x=1702584835; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wghtOxn53V6I4OxyofpRc+7X8C8oFVuawFo9AF9oupM=; b=HUP7pvRhlW9T6ZTqaG6zRs919Jt0Y7XALQb7og0jvH9Yjk0b8VafXP8wMJY3r6dXCN 8enUmkN3JBEm9TyPP+FwVnoBVesEfT8cM9YCqCGxBMYDdKEILKylYanRQZ3cLCwG9k2z bV41RlJ8V8arSB9BvWF9V+CpYv4b0pSRumHAJsyeQ2tbJSDVeOb9KN+Ct5qh3yjwuWKf qzuRXcqGxWpVXV518sT+g5jQRDcyZaPms8b7I/Een71TX5iaXdUUZwTyE64cLRakZIX1 c4Dxd1cI7tGIFXoVboVaNGBrNiPa/3WW1xq205xkFzWcECBQhmLhNR5K15DAVDem/tKn 1y2w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701980035; x=1702584835; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=wghtOxn53V6I4OxyofpRc+7X8C8oFVuawFo9AF9oupM=; b=bcm1FtU+7gCnDKhoL+C0dylViz0vbQujPNi7CDLg/sTCjhkVke5Fr4HsGaOLgoscjZ Bs/aBgk44jNHOx8zxKc0Rsx3bXFhaFpuUDAGVhtpVTMQyOtf7zUCZu9CieMlDlvM4lYF izaytTmOQkKM197JQmIK2GccJuxZXfPsLxQmrsAjFpU14gzvgx+243cmx03ucpQum9vz h1yXtGK7MouxGjlcPxkTADGufXjOVORfA7i5hVc3ZgChj5r/gEQBI6lfEL+ASG0UFs3w RUwZ5CgQwUKYveJokk4SrCK8QVoXeZIgoP5crqKgCfPqca6xW8aHfiHlLrE2kPlkswdX +ZTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxO9IgZhvyJzL7PFXPyDZaD/B0FrSbBSBxmRKHqVd2Ye+iQp79V hKVdeVsNSkc7FIx/c52t7i0VhPpX2TxxO+qbEf7n5OH9IS7X+oNbDGRRxaWh4urnZzHueQEVPc5 TsiSfOvjrDQAetbmwVYULENhhQoAJNBmBCw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3ad0:b0:a1d:afd8:ae89 with SMTP id fi16-20020a1709073ad000b00a1dafd8ae89mr2707723ejc.75.1701980035407; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 12:13:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGuMdiUpcPwyL9u0Vz9Rc9jaXAHhNDwKzqwI9bNvVQGSwDQbtnnGjT3p8x9q2Q5gqQNUbh0a+UVcQjeS6BE9ls=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3ad0:b0:a1d:afd8:ae89 with SMTP id fi16-20020a1709073ad000b00a1dafd8ae89mr2707713ejc.75.1701980034991; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 12:13:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACyFTPEdOL3FpsKDdwJ=0hnv4xKgC6ss+KOSYqmviDqdHEDYmg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACyFTPEdOL3FpsKDdwJ=0hnv4xKgC6ss+KOSYqmviDqdHEDYmg@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2023 14:13:43 -0600
Message-ID: <CAN-Dau1gLjZw0W153nAC=NKTk9cbhf3U-8+SF8YVgZK0xMBArw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daryll Swer <contact=40daryllswer.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000669c46060bf11ba4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/7eJsq2OK0TMrr4ey9fWrA9cYveY>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WGLC for draft-ietf-v6ops-rfc3849-update-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2023 20:14:03 -0000

The existence of a few shorter prefixes doesn’t invalidate the choice of a
/20. I think that is plenty lager of an allocation for this purpose.

Questions about the particular allocation mentioned below are really
inappropriate for this mailing list, and would be more appropriate for
ARIN’s PPML mailing list. Nevertheless, such justifications have never been
and probably never will be public documents. I trust ARIN’s policies have
been followed. Again questioning the policies involved is not really
appropriate for this mailing list either.

Thanks

On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 13:06 Daryll Swer <contact=
40daryllswer.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I'm in favour of the draft moving forward overall, but few points to
> consider:
>
> 1. Regarding section 2, it appears the largest assignment is a /16
> (2630::/16), a fairly new assignment—
> https://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET6-2630-2
> > "The four largest assignments made to end users have been /19s"
>
> 2. Momoka Yamamoto's question on whether a /20 is sufficient or not, in my
> opinion, is a valid question. Whilst it is likely true, that for most
> realistic network planning and documentation a /20 would suffice, but
> whether a /20 documentation prefix would suffice for the future ahead,
> remains unclear in my personal opinion.
>
> *--*
> Best Regards
> Daryll Swer
> Website: daryllswer.com
> <https://mailtrack.io/link/4e654ad52f927e0fb467a8318aa5d0f3738df0ed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.daryllswer.com&userId=2153471&signature=3fcde618c12233cf>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status