IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-v6ops-03-00: (with COMMENT)

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 18 August 2015 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3502F1A887B; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:26:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MHeksK6PMiat; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F34CE1A87C5; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1228; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1439940375; x=1441149975; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=bqIq97GlU85e2UQkzugk7j6B4FxYzgN9cwSOqxA8Z7U=; b=Ruht4tZYouLvAMX4azQAhRjfelvvP8mUs2diWvRSE5y4O6IQw6LMcgXz Hd3r3OyZb2gaBoBFhx5SY9V8GxqYXGEf6dkklkg3HpQhYZ+f5X6X8Hben 6ioInZpMwiNc27pJF9ZLerqHGUCfceqiT4APsMgi5Z99eP7dk5BwMoyuQ 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AfBQAnvtNV/4sNJK1TCoMbgT0GxXoCgTo8EAEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEBAwE6PwULAgEIGB4QIRElAgQOBRuHfgMKCMwWDYVXAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARmLU4JPgV4qMweDGIEUAQSVIgGKfoFtgUqELIwKeYc2JoN9cYFIgQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,705,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="21627746"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2015 23:26:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7INQEgq029685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:26:14 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:26:13 -0500
Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (173.36.12.76) by xch-aln-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:26:13 -0500
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.173]) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com ([173.36.12.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:26:13 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-v6ops-03-00: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQ2g1F/UDaQxfH7UCWTtgudbLFVA==
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:26:12 +0000
Message-ID: <6274BA70-5FEE-487A-BD02-3F7BE33BB733@cisco.com>
References: <20150817162014.13511.99968.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150817162014.13511.99968.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.102.29]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EB600EA0A5C3DF4EAE0DE5421F39D04D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/84Cm8mLVlWPZJZkmSBdtUCdlv2s>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-v6ops-03-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 23:26:17 -0000

> On Aug 17, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This looks like a fine revised charter. I had slight uneasiness about
> adding 
> 
> "2.  Solicit input from network operators and users to identify
> operational interaction issues with the IPv4 Internet, and determine
> solutions or workarounds to those issues."
> 
> because I wondered if this will make v6ops more attractive for NAT
> proposals, but if that's the right thing to do, please do the right
> thing.

In fairness, there is an update to RFC 6145, incorporating a erratum, RFC 6791, draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation, and draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam, happening on the v6ops list right now. The obvious other working groups are either defunct or about to be. Joel told us that if v6ops could agree on the update (which is pretty close), he would take it as AD-sponsored. So, yes, there is a question of translation, and it is being driven by operational considerations.

The question that the sunset4 chairs had with Lee and I was how this fit with their charter, which is essentially about IPv4 shutdown. The current charter wording was worked out with them.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email