Re: [v6ops] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on charter-ietf-v6ops-03-00: (with COMMENT)

[joel jaeggli <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 8/17/15 9:20 AM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for 
> charter-ietf-v6ops-03-00: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
> here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-v6ops/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> 
COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  This looks like a fine revised charter. I had slight uneasiness
> about adding
> 
> "2.  Solicit input from network operators and users to identify 
> operational interaction issues with the IPv4 Internet, and
> determine solutions or workarounds to those issues."
> 
> because I wondered if this will make v6ops more attractive for NAT 
> proposals, but if that's the right thing to do, please do the
> right thing.

Given the extent to which such proposals are viewed with suspicion I
don't think that it's likely. to the extent that v6ops has concerned
itself with this area in the past, it has involved operational use of
work done in behave (464xlat), or largely  how to avoid stateful nats,
deprecation of nat-pt, multihoming without nat (really homenet has
that remit now).

> 
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlXSGqwACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrIDHACfXKC2U5BCAcO37stEmbeNfxY1
rLoAnj3AyHDVv3b2uMDURie78I4sxdaJ
=opkZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----