IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-cui-v6ops-lte-lw4over6

Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com> Fri, 14 February 2014 02:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B6A1A0035 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:10:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qidnynHdGyWJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:10:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FB41A006A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:10:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fa1so11678028pad.28 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:10:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=769ObbmZ4v4OOPEZBpTOFon1j0kEzxXjbKCwYX8zo2U=; b=gduC1dmuFWFOrgxTm23qRKmoNvNRBEsJrjprhXH5khHWekeoq+ha2nRRqWpAMwX91L 94s/8zq5ytv7MuO6WwEFwKAC5lVP3OCHuwmlYe1yDk/lOBpPCOZnb99xnYNQ8gaxWW8Q KxNsj7hU6Dm7Nd9WxrVECJpy9vQrtVO77+IOUTkkqvkpw4RZ6R61/tC9bdEQxCG1ta+/ g53cHxLswmfCclplqP5+I5rJ3cBONCqNu5xdu/pZYjCCAnjTkm2EOgezWlmJfur8pvDG R+Ci+Q4w7xPknfe8Sg1eF8KvcU+DCnhnMFW+/G4mTN/CC56WBu7az10s7hquxDUEXEsb bIqg==
X-Received: by 10.68.14.130 with SMTP id p2mr5723503pbc.17.1392343850928; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.104] ([60.215.217.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sy10sm28054621pac.15.2014.02.13.18.10.44 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Feb 2014 18:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: Qi Sun <sunqi.csnet.thu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGQEPUdw7PHmzaD0zO+_XTzXz4HkaWAC57qb_3Jv+L47fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:10:44 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <57221784-C0E3-47C0-898C-060AEE51C190@gmail.com>
References: <201402131345.s1DDj0911080@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <CAD6AjGQEPUdw7PHmzaD0zO+_XTzXz4HkaWAC57qb_3Jv+L47fw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cb B <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/8TAAvUW0E2ggbRLP81slY2_Rlwk
Cc: draft-cui-v6ops-lte-lw4over6@tools.ietf.org, IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-cui-v6ops-lte-lw4over6
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 02:10:54 -0000

Hi,

Thanks for comments!

We are just trying to just add some existing functions (that are defined in the IETF) to LTE nodes. Would that be OK to discuss it in the IETF?

Best Regards,
Qi

//sorry for send it again (used an wrong mailbox previously)

On 2014-2-13, at 下午9:53, Cb B wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:45 AM,  <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
>> 
>> A new draft has been posted, at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cui-v6ops-lte-lw4over6. Please take a look at it and comment.
>> 
> 
> 
> This draft is suggesting modification to the 3GPP defined nodes such
> as the eNodeB and PGW.  It would be better if these modifications to
> 3GPP defined nodes were examined in the 3GPP, not the IETF.
> 
> CB
> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email