IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 Operations - IETF 82 Agenda

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 27 October 2011 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A19311E809A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.830, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id De01QiLrK8to for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C85611E807F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=2553; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1319754689; x=1320964289; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h/uzORrsvA5Md9B5w/E/lYlujAuH7BfGDJUuYkT/AcY=; b=fDU89p6UWnF3XQYm7oVjB0Y8fIv370McZL3ZXA6T2is39y91jIACmwHc 0/coPLzADX221WyqgKLRPUXqWNEU5eI+vHO2N2MaerOLhboAWHTuKkG/3 gy78fxIm/NPt9lzdNCGx8EvTrEhQ6mAMRxeADVRKLuJ8YPSa9uIDK1vxq 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAEnbqU6rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABDqWCBBYFyAQEBAwEBAQELBAEnKwkLBQsLGC4nMAYTIodgCJZoAZ40BIgdYQSIBowHhS2MUQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,415,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="10793223"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Oct 2011 22:31:29 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local ([10.21.75.217]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9RMVSwB021050; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:31:28 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:31:29 -0600
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:31:29 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EA9D95E.9040504@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:31:19 -0600
Message-Id: <A00FB5D1-1737-4191-84BE-3DCAD0E81567@cisco.com>
References: <65447EBF-B4BD-4AC8-BE16-7C933DDE1477@cisco.com> <4EA9D95E.9040504@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 Operations - IETF 82 Agenda
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 22:31:30 -0000

On Oct 27, 2011, at 4:21 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> There are oustanding requests to introduce draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance
> and draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance. I fully agree with a policy
> of not devoting large amounts of time to drafts that haven't yet been
> discussed extensively on the list, but experience shows that people
> need a nudge to get interested in a new topic.

I have been nudging, and not gotten a response.

On draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance, I have seen comments from you and myself on draft-carpenter-v6ops-icp-guidance, and Tassos gave you a review. On draft-carpenter-v6ops-label-balance, the only comment I have seen is from you, and said "if there is interest, I'd like to discuss this".

I'll invite you to nudge for working group commentary, and even if folks say during the agenda bash that they want them added I'll add them. I have gotten a load from the working group on not being strict enough about inclusion, and am applying the rule we agreed on in Prague - no email discussion, no f2f discussion, unless there is something pretty clearly timely and relevant (such as WIDE's report on running an IPv6-only network).

> Regards
>   Brian
> 
> On 2011-10-27 21:48, Fred Baker wrote:
>> Our agenda as it stands today. Comments appreciated. Still looking for comments on several recent drafts, or reposting of older drafts people want to discuss.
>> 
>> IPv6 Operations - IETF 82
>> 
>> Wednesday
>> 
>> Agenda bashing
>> 
>> Operational Neighbor Discovery Problems
>> 24-Oct-11 , <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6nd-problems>
>> Basic Requirements for IPv6 Customer Edge Routers
>> 18-Oct-11 , <draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis>
>> Wireline Incremental IPv6
>> 9-Oct-11 , <draft-kuarsingh-wireline-incremental-ipv6>
>> Analysis and recommendation for the ULA usage
>> 21-Oct-11 , <draft-liu-v6ops-ula-usage-analysis>
>> Thursday
>> 
>> Comcast IPv6 Trial/Deployment Experiences
>> 2-Oct-11 , <draft-jjmb-v6ops-comcast-ipv6-experiences>
>> Experiences from an IPv6-Only Network in the WIDE Camp Autumn 2011
>> 23-Oct-11 , <draft-hazeyama-widecamp-ipv6-only-experience>
>> Stateless Source Address Mapping for ICMPv6 Packets
>> 25-Jul-11 , <draft-xli-v6ops-ivi-icmp-address>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email