Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-02.txt

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Mon, 02 November 2015 01:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11201A1AB9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:03:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4-xMno-lrcCY for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:03:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x232.google.com (mail-io0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43A061A1B1F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:03:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ioll68 with SMTP id l68so130584107iol.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:03:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sYWhFlnvn9Ekdv+1gHNAucZ+btXV9SkxsPnFTzSsizY=; b=d/m5WqicZ71VQ2kSRJwYph/eTxgjV13TZuFYPT9hcsZW9G+rjPxl3pF5hIOxWLYjqK Q7YPugjQkwJzz0CT8xQJmtf+ygf27s+2XHNx4oUAO+yhoVjcggJIEOtttInw+/OHcJa5 j4RmTEKLs7wEnQwt5XJsbjDNeZ2WIIJCitETNj7Oerwu7KXOPXQCqskHR9EqbNNNTPKp ZhzXsWKMhXC5i7lFq85n/neN8XRFZ8ADqCyI2AiY+UzC89zJsLCnpFl6YDlfLZHQhYtS xLFjSKZzrFk1I4cSu9FgKE4qGwtqkHdSUXXrL6cXFnqY5O4I7vMTWyX5X5OEXuwCSFj2 17Ug==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.159.72 with SMTP id i69mr23438845ioe.4.1446426202597; Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:03:22 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.107.140.71 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Nov 2015 17:03:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5636AEF9.7010200@gmail.com>
References: <20151101160702.19175.44949.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511020113120.15542@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5636AEF9.7010200@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 10:03:22 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: j_SHad5KUxddbzEfw0LbkMAR6pY
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqfXG_KbQJAv7zjTsX-Xe+6stMRKvGuS4m15gbBhEU9RMw@mail.gmail.com>
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/BZum1mHD-3dewKgX-9yTO_SOgtw>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 01:03:31 -0000

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Brian E Carpenter
<brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

>>
>> I see there have been changes to replace "smaller" prefix size. Personally I don't like "shorter" and "longer", it's not
>> intuitive which is which (compare using -gt and -le in prefix filter lists).
>>
>
> "Smaller" is completely ambiguous - does it means smaller prefix or smaller address block?

At the time of the WGLC I proposed the following text:

   Assigning prefixes with the length larger than 64 will limit...

(https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg22862.html)

This may sound too verbose but shouldn't have any ambiguity.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya