IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-hazeyama-widecamp-ipv6-only-experience-01

GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com> Thu, 22 March 2012 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <phdgang@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2654B21E802C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tYowvOOkuoPv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EFC21E8026 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by werb10 with SMTP id b10so1834735wer.31 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=P84RVLCIq/UL8rQhOMWKbROGOUhMZtKr1vck8XYm+UM=; b=mctf09BDPGigZWxq8lbDPDUJytz6Q4EmxHKNzyi6bRpTczUFqPE4O5OWaWMnE88c8J FsbF4ySkKAng3PRmPPENHytnlDsphAXAoGzy7zrjEq7OySO60vlP37SrPhgW0LS3HMVh O8F2aeNQVYIXuQEaXZW1nLCJ/bWGb7nHbO/axoBddyMovtXAWahqvfhLlMNQQbeEmC3Y /JqScCv2x9AjaY5uZosclsmB8zVm3IJRYC+XzH4m8wCeF4cKbJaIYsLJ3gSvr/MgkLmO ZDp/B95r9gY1xwUoWH5aXXAEV0z/QGVK1RwTk+T5s0GLbMjqkyls4RPXwy2cIDVcGrAL gvNg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.137.97 with SMTP id x75mr4128277wei.25.1332399700534; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.7.105 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Mar 2012 00:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F6AB545.50904@inetcore.com>
References: <CAM+vMERyvyL4r5=vhkUYTg8D2eFSnA98a54ybtMJU6a9FUPwgA@mail.gmail.com> <4F6AB545.50904@inetcore.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:01:40 +0800
Message-ID: <CAM+vMEQnaziQdkOF22VNLCh-1-kU4ebWVXq4ixe_TNGb=a0Zhw@mail.gmail.com>
From: GangChen <phdgang@gmail.com>
To: Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-hazeyama-widecamp-ipv6-only-experience-01
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 07:01:42 -0000

Hello Ruri,

2012/3/22, Ruri Hiromi <hiromi@inetcore.com>:
> Consequently the correct answer for this goes "yes".
> We will make a correction at Frag. C => S in the 4rd/IPoE case on table
> 7 as follows.
>
>         +-----------------+-------------------+------------------+
>         |     Elements    |   4RD/PPPoE (v4)  |   4RD/IPoE (v4)  |
>         +-----------------+-------------------+------------------+
>         |       NAT       |       Exist       |       Exist      |
>         | --------------- | ----------------- | ---------------- |
>         |     Mapping     |        Bad        |       Good       |
>         | --------------- | ----------------- | ---------------- |
>         |    Filtering    |        Good       |       Good       |
>         | --------------- | ----------------- | ---------------- |
>         |       RTT       |        156        |        323       |
>         | --------------- | ----------------- | ---------------- |
>         | MTU size C => S |        1452       |       1452       |
>         | --------------- | ----------------- | ---------------- |
>         |   Frag. C => S  |         NO        |        YES       |
                                              ^^^^^^^

Still NO here? I guess that's a typo?

>
>
>> 2. I guess some statements on "dependency between IPv4 and IPv6
>> address" should be clarified further.
>
> Thank you for the advice. We will modify it more appropriate expression.

It would be good if you could give more details on the list.

Many thanks

Gang

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email