IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 13 April 2020 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A60A3A1C4E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JaYQOItvceu8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0703A1C4D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id a201so10730580wme.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=ilVJxE8R6i9qmaV4KaWaIrxWXSPj7X4Y2jcUxVwuPOE=; b=EnnBhCxZDhGS4Mtq/g5A5Mgm6ttJJsgDJcOtEPOWuhijSE6Xn/txUqBmdK4FtBGmAo i4kF4SiGl92UqIPIiiHykHpl9FdbrRHji8bsms+rD5u2UCdvB7PMHYjrorSVUflKV185 LWDZyhbgBJO+78xB+X5XBm+7kHzRVhjSyP/z0X4b1UGySsXtioWDMWeUGzQzq2QOhHcy Nk/+5yqmND7cLMlTHDkvjasOr7lLGOgfs+CWtCWfX/xLck2UTBSj9vsHzUKUl6a0YNs0 cW8nppjUHmqn/pOiFAfCBJhHl4PuY4pgxOJVpmuRo4c9TDUPBABzHj7nz4vDHbYH/5RW QSqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=ilVJxE8R6i9qmaV4KaWaIrxWXSPj7X4Y2jcUxVwuPOE=; b=jJ0vV/ne8HzeNyRLyK9M93tbaph9YwFyrj+bFR8ux+xlL7PP6GtNvXbeYimGRYOa7G TmaPdZYsB8RTrh/qJi4JD8lOsakziVmKYMFgwP5fG4VeHkgCY5pm6nFpg+QK0uDBruCL QGpqOpDtKY413qAaxxFDRkOnG7cb0TYK743kMQgDYRFeuCWxN+jdFSIVF6c7t+1KXjWO cJCLA43Lk5Cqw9sBRGI4s2ey23Dx59NCvEQ0ycnGDeFZgYfsewuZSI9xBxlBnhDlmG4B Cd8IffYgs7noTrOSXMqbcduJKvaGBhqDreUx+H0KnTfvfAVNyHxz8VEg+lsifHEYqzKl crxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZv84lS4I+zRRA6EaVXrAi7ym2rh2YstDszHu0qlVAzcTwM6DuM y31F8XnDsFdKWYF/HeruE2MBdcdt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKyvDOBT9N2MRiDugl3h92zKCAb8NLDT4WF+HVs7kCotp3in9mKB5WzDVWfdub07/7d6a+rqw==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c250:: with SMTP id b16mr20744422wmj.100.1586804881205; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8802:5900:13c4::1003? ([2600:8802:5900:13c4::1003]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 145sm16545361wma.1.2020.04.13.12.07.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:08:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <C9FE7271-5D87-490B-9330-4162B49AB381@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_06F21A95-D2D5-4243-BC66-97AD62F171ED"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 12:07:57 -0700
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR05MB63485C37CC3ADCF87CB8BC9CAECB0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Jan Žorž <jan@zorz.si>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
References: <DM6PR05MB63485C37CC3ADCF87CB8BC9CAECB0@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/C6Qqxq6FcAGYg8h9ufcGRpT5EX8>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 19:08:04 -0000

For the record, this discussion has closed, and Ron sent a note this morning opening a new WGLC. Fernando has opened a thread in which he is verifying that changes he is making address the points raised. I expect he will post a new draft in a week or two. I will query those who responded in that thread and convince myself that they are happy with the changes, run a quick WGVLC (working group very last call) on the list, and then be looking for a draft shepherd as described in IETF processes.

> On Mar 30, 2020, at 8:47 AM, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> This message initiates a WG Last Call on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum.
> 
> Please submit comments by April 13, 2020.
> 
>                                   Fred and Ron
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email