Re: [v6ops] question about draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-06 (was draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Mon, 03 July 2017 08:06 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=MDaemon; d=consulintel.es; c=simple; q=dns; h=from:message-id; b=gI3gXHIHfuYx2MsyISlK1NYq2GfOIjtPD6NZj7NDOCbuMJh0cJUWsIqH7Gr5 FBq9ZHArWVzEHkb9vIH/unADwUFrvmDD/ltBkKP2EHMpc95vJwpBA/gtz Tx1+bbZ+JKD77C3SjD9uVx0877EYKVYKZmqe5mhfCUsUDUuOwwI8lk=;
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.21.0.170409
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 10:06:47 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <BF079711-4016-4C5A-A8D8-C082BBA6DDEC@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] question about draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-06 (was draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
References: <F0CF1BE8-52C8-4A0E-A35D-47814476DC1E@consulintel.es> <CAKD1Yr3E+FUAJSSehMbn1nDuKbqQB8+MywYzoUMYL2UR7dbbvQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr3E+FUAJSSehMbn1nDuKbqQB8+MywYzoUMYL2UR7dbbvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/CLjV4YRzoaGpSquEtUCpFX5UVHU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] question about draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-06 (was draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
Precedence: list

I guess I’m not good describing what I want to say …

What I mean is that a host can be connected to multiple networks, and it may need to use a single prefix (from each network, not the same prefix in different ones).

Regards,
Jordi
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Responder a: <lorenzo@google.com>
Fecha: lunes, 3 de julio de 2017, 10:03
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
CC: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Asunto: Re: [v6ops] question about draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-06 (was draft-jjmb-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)

    On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 4:56 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
    
    What I mean is that, reading the document a “new” reader may understand that only hosts with a single link may use this, and I think the original goal is that a unique IPv6 prefix can be used by a host and not just in one interface, but in any of the interfaces.
    
    
    
    I don't think using the same prefix on multiple interfaces is necessarily a goal The goal is to route an entire prefix to a host, such that different hosts are guaranteed to have different prefixes.
     
    
    Some possible text improvements for that:
    
    New p., at the end of the abstract:
    This approach may be used also in several interfaces of a single host.
    
    
    
    That is true of *any* IP addressing mechanism. All existing mechanisms for IP address assignment (SLAAC, manual configuration, DHCPv6, ...) can be used on multiple interfaces simultaneously.
    
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

Re: [v6ops] question about draft-ietf-v6ops-uniqu… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Re: [v6ops] question about draft-ietf-v6ops-uniqu… Lorenzo Colitti
Re: [v6ops] question about draft-ietf-v6ops-uniqu… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ