Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt)
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 10 March 2015 02:28 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891831A0069 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 19:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ah7lI-pnOgjy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 19:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A8DE1A00F6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 19:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdev10 with SMTP id v10so38948672pde.13 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=f5CL+TQtBlNJj7Qt6vhjtukRTS7x5YCWzr4XjHMGMk0=; b=Lr8N5Po/LdWjMjcuvpv5JRShExOSWJvKfxdxsStPEKIQHzbXEoqU9tvR9RbW5hiwNv A4m5t26Gdn+eMlAPJIH/X5oLzPCwJAzTYtRxhSbrxd+J1BAn1+8++Ja+rjU3bmwZlySG WxLbXwUjBzFNhvlUQs0BcHGuxBFSxB5zF8/DAU0ArNOAP/9NQ4IHAzyCJ5izbnW99FRr aH2QON5ywuskBNd74bQuQziX0LHrf5BF6OGlLD0bw8X0aW1wba4eHUCskKzOa4qKFr3E QjO3oM/w+ixM+iJA05WLClTlA3aGkkXtjA30k1Te1D1BNwasQIJ6oOeJN5odk5+pzKdc BJgA==
X-Received: by 10.70.0.207 with SMTP id 15mr9683754pdg.56.1425954515424; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.9.163] ([103.23.18.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g11sm21445822pat.24.2015.03.09.19.28.33 for <v6ops@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <54FE56D3.4050104@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:28:35 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <20150309163330.30198.34988.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <54FE0A1B.2010009@umn.edu>
In-Reply-To: <54FE0A1B.2010009@umn.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/E4gWUvgHrT9ro1p-puLXw0L6pzg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers' to Best Current Practice (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 02:28:55 -0000
On 10/03/2015 10:01, David Farmer wrote:
> On 3/9/15 11:33 , The IESG wrote:
>> The IESG has approved the following document:
>> - 'Deprecating Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay Routers'
>> (draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11.txt) as Best Current Practice
>
> Good News!
>
> ...
>> In response to the IANA review:
>>
>> OLD:
>>
>> Instead, IANA is requested to mark the 192.88.99.0/24
>> prefix originally defined by [RFC3068] as "Deprecated (6to4 Relay
>> Anycast)", pointing to the present document.
>>
>> NEW:
>>
>> Instead, IANA is requested to mark the 192.88.99.0/24
>> prefix originally defined by [RFC3068] as "Deprecated (6to4 Relay
>> Anycast)", pointing to the present document. The Boolean values
>> for the address block 192.88.99.0/24 will all be removed.
>
> What is the rationale for removing the Boolean values? Wouldn't the current values apply until the prefix is repurposed or
> removed by future protocol action?
>
> I'm not sure I really care, but I don't understand what is served by removing the current values. I'm not sure what purpose the
> Boolean values really serve, but the current values seem the most appropriate until the prefix is permanently removed or
> repurposed.
Well, IANA wanted this change. I sympathise because it means they never have
to revisit this in the future.
Brian
- [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast Pre… The IESG
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… David Farmer
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] Protocol Action: 'Deprecating Anycast… David Farmer