IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-00.txt

"Don Sturek" <d.sturek@att.net> Tue, 15 March 2011 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <d.sturek@att.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D033A6EA0 for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.049
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fOySaajv00ow for <v6ops@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm1-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm1-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.74]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BD963A6E92 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.138.90.55] by nm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Mar 2011 20:55:53 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.251] by tm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Mar 2011 20:55:53 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1043.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 15 Mar 2011 20:55:53 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 922017.18618.bm@omp1043.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 49130 invoked from network); 15 Mar 2011 20:55:53 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1300222553; bh=MP5Vrbi0XCVDcOoJueL9RDO5xl95hIAlAJYVY1GHlwg=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Reply-To:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=A4aTNk7L1GArSzQiv9xqBrqhIP2QZa1Zz3fno+TeaimcGQ7i3jY1+z044kcXf3Z6JZC/Pa4ZH6nRhjlfz1FKAajWQmQpGdhKj3J2skull1s4k50VXaQUs0vfmdAUEMS/ibhMpcfe8h3fCxcUyScOA0wqB4ZDi63wN2rjiWzFNl0=
Received: from Studio (d.sturek@174.78.56.227 with login) by smtp108.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Mar 2011 13:55:53 -0700 PDT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: fvjol_aswBAraSJvMLe2r1XTzhBhbFxY8q8c3jo-
X-YMail-OSG: 9M6LMlIVM1kZErBqmYeqhSoDTvbkgTdmlqs5ykdqfQHute1 5kWs5NvPD9A293imUq7Z5.LJ9Hd.hRRvvUc6KJP_zAiOeB_p0UiwtFq5gWK_ Frywz2GXw873pojqccrlm8OO7D_bKO6ATBDELyyL7nlDPhhm.eMdSQctQJB6 Yc9.Z9QsES_jR3BpkT6bXsdxZOZakxnIv7zhHSb9mfQGRFRljMoL526YXj.. 17f0WlilNwY3lyF3X97UudwlIH2DKAJjS7udUO8TFNm_Lgea1YjXzLqyUe7i HoHgFo2NgI9Eh7c7GngNiZR_tGpM3enyvILWSgteC93RMW6WLVXz1VAU5azb b.yhV
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
From: Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net>
To: "'Hemant Singh (shemant)'" <shemant@cisco.com>, 'james woodyatt' <jhw@apple.com>, 'IPv6 Ops WG' <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <20110305184502.18531.25548.idtracker@localhost><76C43B2A-FEE5-4328-AB05-A10C38B23B2C@gmail.com><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3F8B93C@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com><C895B643-E461-4191-BAC3-EF735311F2F0@apple.com><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3F8B9B0@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com><E76372ED-41A1-4987-9ECF-888B285DD606@apple.com><4D7E685A.80202@bogus.com><5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C301049872@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <F0D4FEF4-D308-4DDE-B84C-2FFCE60B9376@apple.com> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3010499AA@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C3010499AA@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:55:50 -0700
Message-ID: <000a01cbe353$5e325a20$1a970e60$@sturek>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcvjUPgF4bdZzDciQU6+FzmuDY0wHAAAE+2gAABjBhA=
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: d.sturek@att.net
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:54:32 -0000

Hi Hermant,

Both Tom Herbst and myself (Don Sturek, representing Pacific Gas and
Electric) will be in Prague and would like to discuss further the CPE
Enhancements draft and the requirements around internetworked CPE within a
home.

As outlined in the
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00 draft,
activities are underway to deploy IPv6 enabled smart meters as well as
support in WiFi and HomePlug to internetwork these smart meters with
existing home networks connected to existing ISPs.

The scenarios described in the draft are a little more than a year from
large scale deployment (11 million smart meters installed to date)

Don


-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hemant Singh (shemant)
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 1:48 PM
To: james woodyatt; IPv6 Ops WG
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-00.txt



-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of james woodyatt
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 4:38 PM
To: IPv6 Ops WG
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D
Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-00.txt


>Huh?  Where is the draft that documents this?

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-herbst-v6ops-cpeenhancements-00

Snipped from the Abstract of the document above, is this text between
squared brackets.

[WiFi access points, cable boxes and other home devices with internet
access could all be internetworked with smart metering devices by
customers with no data networking expertise resulting in a complex
multi-segment network with differing prefixes, routing support and
service discovery needs.]

I am sure there is other text in the document that points out two
different routers in the home connected to two different SPs (one SP is
the home's DSL or broadband SP and the other SP is the Power Grid
company with their IPv6 CE router for the home) and thus one has a
multihomed home.  Anyway, you should look at Tom Herbst's prezo given to
the v6ops at the IETF79 in Beijing that clearly shows a multihomed
network.  Note also that multihomed involves both a multihomed WAN and
LAN for CE Router.

Hemant
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email