Re: [v6ops] I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-bis-00.txt

[Tim Chown <[e-mail]>]

On 21 Mar 2011, at 13:53, Rémi Després wrote:

> 
> Le 18 mars 2011 à 23:48, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
> 
>> On 2011-03-19 11:03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> ...
>>> When a host with an address from both PREFIX1 and PREFIX2 which resides
>>> on the same LAN, whereto should it send it's outgoing packets? If
>>> packets from PREFIX1 ends up on ISP2 it'll be uRPF filtered, and vice
>>> versa.
>> 
>> Yes, that's the exit selection problem in a nutshell. Since we don't
>> have a standardised solution yet we can't specify it in
>> ipv6-cpe-router-bis. I expect it will have to be left for
>> ipv6-cpe-router-ter.
>> 
>> I think the continuation of the discussion belongs on a thread
>> for draft-v6ops-multihoming-without-nat66.
> 
> +1
> This draft is IMHO a good starting point.
> 
> It deals with hosts that know their global addresses, and know which next hop to use depending on their global source addresses. 
> For ULA networks, a complement is AFAIK needed. 

There's also other relevant material buried in the vaults of multi6 history, e.g. draft-huitema-multi6-hosts-03 and draft-huitema-multi6-ingress-filtering-00.

Tim