IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 multicast WiFi power usage - draft-desmouceaux-ipv6-mcast-wifi-power-usage

Mark Boolootian <booloo@ucsc.edu> Wed, 23 July 2014 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <booloo@ucsc.edu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5851B2892 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQtBXOHnmV0w for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9641B288B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:48:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id z60so2350032qgd.19 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ucsc.edu; s=ucsc-google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=f3iQSMi5yURFcxjypMh92r5KFXHWgNerIjcw0C6xYRA=; b=YveNjFYwjB0JKPnEBhZvsCrRNW0nOTt6TpJLZQSV2viE/j5jwxZue2xmsD0kdJP/HW GHWAGuE4nV+9HvTXOG2yPkiv/SgEuQGrseQqP1vwbS0D+v7bV/+89L97pVr+KUsS7utU 9fcFEqdtfieFpp3yumYKUCYZ4s6L9edLvG4iw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f3iQSMi5yURFcxjypMh92r5KFXHWgNerIjcw0C6xYRA=; b=bJdwfZ2pJjqv7SafsiS2JEpjBY8u/2Z8ufT48P8ebgx6wBgvMq2Sud2BF/aTI10put 7SuSWkBBnWLpnwOk5+Uai/LeI2T1XyiqQRcREcDZ+bw9sZipXgkthRZbB9SaTPtZH0vz dUZRcfeb05S0hSXIiDf8VVRIL7w7roRUmgrJFajWsZNQvtC0XYS7jpZ+35K7/XHnAUe6 /Njk0JhrVirARpoYXgszvD6eda9RYEieYP0/TJw7rfwQwWiEaDZVYm5U6UkblSO0pIRF vNBrGTaZmz4Vp8UwdgIMz2+oJsDZZK3jcssF2WTKynk/WtCnJRtjQ9pvZo3Bc+aAKcmw LBww==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqLabHnO4EL89iqs9cEUzYPrFiA/fDRh7w5niJqHgWlbFzN0ihhS5gwT6iPclO+plg6Y1N
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.119.198 with SMTP id a6mr8047644qar.39.1406159302415; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.84.233 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140723233055.GJ23822@angus.ind.WPI.EDU>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1407111511580.77389@ayourtch-mac> <53C114E8.7020404@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1407141120190.23928@ayourtch-mac> <53C4FF39.2070600@gmail.com> <CAMugd_VVbMQRB30C8r4LTy6nL5BDa+iQhJ1QZeC0y_tVuwqgtg@mail.gmail.com> <20140723233055.GJ23822@angus.ind.WPI.EDU>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:48:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMCLrkE072QmmHk3M3TouzH4Jw1Mr5=v4iFNjd_VymsWWqHM+A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Boolootian <booloo@ucsc.edu>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/FoHKuwcljo0dR9BbkwufZDaWY0Y
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 multicast WiFi power usage - draft-desmouceaux-ipv6-mcast-wifi-power-usage
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 23:48:24 -0000

> IPv6 multicast DOES appear to cause problems for wired networks too.
> This guy experienced MLD reports being sent for 350 solicited node
> multicast groups by a single Windows box with 350 Privacy Addresses in
> use:

Can privacy addresses be completely eliminated through the use of
DHCPv6 (disabling SLAAC on the router)?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email