IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 multicast WiFi power usage - draft-desmouceaux-ipv6-mcast-wifi-power-usage

Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com> Tue, 15 July 2014 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2B11B28C3 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9XeU3P9D201q for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22d.google.com (mail-yk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39AD91B28D1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yk0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 131so367797ykp.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DMaKJmg90NHCSulzXGSU2CQsB7KXHiw05yJ3lKxB0ok=; b=0uHsbSC0LhwX/SQEZ6RQXyjWwrlU14weLkoAlDj3uJNFgg8wIvPrhJxnGNWdw6goRW 3bUB79e4ORMYl7YmzoX8ZCOZ8VCUyAs5ZSAI1yg+Q8tOEl3+6zbvPU/3bka1FrEEI4ka Hs1GXxoyQvozKqGWvRwKiPGNrvpUVQN0chjnjRMFmhBeMtJnuMUfCMB0hTx+sW8FPVNQ cVT4MmYsT6hczxcHgxi36QY/Q0zIaw94pEbJJ8NMWuXQwmh/xU1MWQZ0kie40lnjkz4q Qf28wN7D/n8RjcqKp7H0LQ00WJP2fXww0paA3q52rADAAhcIdB70SOZawopr2MrlDine k3qg==
X-Received: by 10.236.220.33 with SMTP id n31mr5747268yhp.151.1405435518511; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.99.64] ([201.221.226.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p55sm27133203yhh.34.2014.07.15.07.45.16 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 07:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53C4FF39.2070600@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 05:45:21 -0430
From: Alejandro Acosta <alejandroacostaalamo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@cisco.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1407111511580.77389@ayourtch-mac> <53C114E8.7020404@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1407141120190.23928@ayourtch-mac>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1407141120190.23928@ayourtch-mac>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/yedgGRf2oaSKNGssVQBcTdJm4JQ
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 multicast WiFi power usage - draft-desmouceaux-ipv6-mcast-wifi-power-usage
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:47:45 -0000

Hi Andrew,
  My only comment inline:

El 7/14/2014 4:52 AM, Andrew Yourtchenko escribió:
> Alejandro,
> 
> interesting idea. Could you elaborate a bit more ? I'm guessing it would
> be something to do with the power consumption, but estimating the power
> consumption in the generic case is really really tricky, so I am
> wondering how this kind of section might look like to be useful.

  Thanks for asking, in fact after I sent I got stuck thinking in this
topic.
  While reading
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-desmouceaux-ipv6-mcast-wifi-power-usage-00
 I was thinking that probably some drafts or documents might include an
environmental section which should be related to green stuff such as
power consumption and things no harmful for the environment.
  Trying to elaborate a bit more the idea would be something very
similar to the current Security section which is mandatory. If we
include an environmental section it could help IETF to develop better
and more friendly protocols to the environment. Is it time to do it?,
  If we want to be idealistic low power consumption should be encourage
in all areas -not only mobile-, devices should be able to get in sleep
mode without affecting the network and much more (CPU processing, etc).

My 2 cents,

Alejandro,


> 
> thanks!
> 
> --a
> 
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>  Very nice draft and very interesting results. While reading it I was
>> thinking that certain drafts could include something like a "Enviroment
>> friendly section".
>>
>> Alejandro,
>>
>>
>> El 7/11/2014 8:46 AM, Andrew Yourtchenko escribió:
>>> hi all,
>>>
>>> last IETF there were presentations about ND, multicast and power usage
>>> on the WiFi, the consensus was we need more data on it.
>>>
>>> Yoann did a nontrivial amount of work on this subject in the meantime
>>> and we'd like to show it to you and hear your feedback.
>>>
>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-desmouceaux-ipv6-mcast-wifi-power-usage-00
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks a lot!
>>>
>>> --a
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> v6ops mailing list
>>> v6ops@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email