Re: [v6ops] Looking for info on IGP choices in production dual-stack networks

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Mon, 08 June 2015 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F031B2CA7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 23:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2PdIKcjmngDi for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 23:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [195.30.115.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EC401B2C96 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2015 23:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CE460874 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 08:49:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC1A86077C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 08:49:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 42395 invoked by uid 1007); 8 Jun 2015 08:49:55 +0200
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 08:49:55 +0200
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <20150608064955.GA54385@Space.Net>
References: <D5A1FD44-0ECD-41CE-AEC6-7A85C80D465E@magma.ca> <1674874883.7129828.1433575061194.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <5574C093.5000909@foobar.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5574C093.5000909@foobar.org>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/H0rW0pVu_ckA7IfJNeNIG_2UQXw>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Looking for info on IGP choices in production dual-stack networks
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 06:50:01 -0000

hi,

On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 11:07:15PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> EIGRP and Babel are fine for IPv4 and IPv6 IGP operation but completely
> useless the moment you enable mpls, because they're distance vector
> protocols and mpls needs a full topology map in order to work.  

Don't tell that to my MPLS routers.  *TE* needs the topology map, normal
LSPs work perfectly well with distance-vector protocols.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279